Since Article 120 § 1 and Article 122 of the Basic Criminal Code were referencing (blanket) provisions [1] referring to the rules of international law (ibid.), the State Attorney’s Office

He also argued that use of the ASBO was unnecessary as other powers in law were sufficient, and that it was disproportionate because it amounted to a blanket prohibition on public nudity.

In particular, the Constitution of Ukraine generally allowed peaceful assemblies, which could therefore not be prohibited in a blanket manner.

According to the applicant, the blankets were not washed regularly. The Government disputed that allegation. The cell did not have access to daylight and was equipped with a 100W electric lamp.

The applicants submitted that they could not be blamed for the absence of other plaintiffs given that the applicants and their lawyer had been present at such hearings.

    In an appeal against his conviction, the first applicant argued, in particular, that Article   20.2 of the CAO was a blanket provision and referred to the procedure for holding public

été réellement et nécessairement exposés afin de prévenir ou redresser le fait jugé constitutif d'une violation de la Convention, et s'ils étaient raisonnables quant à leur taux (voir, par exemple, Bladet

Royaume-Uni , arrêt du 27   mars 1996, Recueil des arrêts et décisions 1996 ‑ II, p. 500, §   39, et Bladet Tromsø et Stensaas c.

goes hand in hand with a European supervision by the Court, whose task it is to give a final ruling on whether a restriction is reconcilable with freedom of expression as protected by Article 10 (see, Bladet

as public watchdog: they have a duty to report on matters of public interest (see, among many authorities, Observer and Guardian v. the United Kingdom , 26 November 1991, § 59, Series A no. 216, and Bladet

Royaume-Uni , arrêt du 27   mars   1996, Recueil des arrêts et décisions 1996 ‑ II, p. 500, § 39, et Bladet Tromsø et Stensaas c.

expenses were actually and necessarily incurred in order to prevent or obtain redress for the matter found to constitute a violation of the Convention and were reasonable as to quantum (see, for instance, Bladet

une jurisprudence bien établie et très abondante quant à l’étendue et les limites de la liberté d’expression des journalistes, au sens de l’article 10 de la Convention (voir, parmi beaucoup d’autres, Bladet

Nevertheless, the press must not overstep certain bounds, in particular in respect of the reputation and rights of others (see Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v.

  Autriche , 29   août 1997, §   55, Recueil 1997 ‑ V, Bladet Tromsø et Stensaas , précité, §§   66 et 68, Colombani et autres c.

Les défendeurs contestent avoir eu connaissance d’une infestation de blattes.

The Court considers that the applicant cannot be blamed for refusing to settle for less than he was entitled to under the judgment of 28 January 2004 (see Kornev v. Russia , no.

The Court further observed that the changes in the testimonies of those assailants who had at first blamed G.M.G. for stabbing the victim had initially been dealt with expeditiously by the authorities.

    Regarding the applicant's motions and appeals, the Court reiterates that the applicant cannot be blamed for using the avenues available to her under domestic law in order to protect her interests