Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-199629
6 décembre 2019
6 décembre 2019
The applicant had been summoned to three hearings, but none of the summonses have ever been served on him, allegedly because service had been attempted to his presumed address and not to his registered
Source officielleETRANGERS
644a12ab656d26d0f8b57fb0
26 avril 2023
26 avril 2023
le maintien au centre de rétention de : [K] [P] né le 21 Novembre 1998 à [Localité 1] (ALGÉRIE) de nationalité Algérienne Vu l'appel formé le 24/04/2023 à 15 h 01 par courriel, par Me Aurore BECHARD
Source officielle3ème Ch.section E
65e7739e79d7e316eba7bab8
21 décembre 2023
21 décembre 2023
de nationalité Française, demeurant [Adresse 6] représentée par Me Carine CHAINAIS, avocat au barreau de RENNES COMPOSITION Maryline BOIZARD, Juge aux affaires familiales, Assisté de Christine BECAERT
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-244310
23 juin 2025
23 juin 2025
His constitutional appeal alleging a denial of a fair trial because he did not understand the waiver nor the decision in Czech was dismissed as manifestly ill-founded by the Constitutional Court decision
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-227685
29 août 2023
29 août 2023
CASE The application concerns a complaint that the refusal of the domestic authorities to enrol the applicant, a girl aged 17 at the time of the events, in the local age-appropriate football team - because
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-217570
3 mai 2022
3 mai 2022
The applicant complains of a violation of Article 3 because he was held in inhuman conditions of detention. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-126959
12 septembre 2013
12 septembre 2013
The authorities found that the judgement and the court summons had no value of evidence because the applicant had only submitted the copies of them.
Source officielle1ère Chambre
6788a3cf05b7378c3f0c5302
14 janvier 2025
14 janvier 2025
GO PNEUS (POINT S) sise [Adresse 5] Représentée par Me Mikaël LE DENMAT de la SELARL AITALI -GROS-CARPI-LE DENMAT-DE BUCY-BECHARI, avocat au barreau de BESANCON APPELANTE ET : Société
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0511DEC006243900
11 mai 2006
11 mai 2006
The applicant’s aunt became his official tutor. The applicant was registered at the aunt’s flat and moved there.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1127DEC006668801
27 novembre 2008
27 novembre 2008
On the way to the [Internal Affairs Department] there was no need to apply physical force to him because he had voluntarily agreed to follow the officers.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0927DEC005674500
27 septembre 2005
27 septembre 2005
He further complained that his trial by the prison Governor violated Article 6 because he was not allowed legal representation, because of the role of the Governor and because of the absence of a public
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:1012DEC002142693
12 octobre 1994
12 octobre 1994
In his request he explained how he wished to cease production at Ötz because it was situated some 100 kilometres from Mäder, he was unable to run both sites himself and because the tenant who had
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0201JUD001280302
1 février 2007
1 février 2007
Twice they were adjourned because of the defendant's failure to appear and three times because the court requested additional documentary evidence and the judge participated in another hearing.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0304JUD002272104
4 mars 2010
4 mars 2010
In the period between 31 March 1997 and 29 October 1997 the hearing was adjourned on two occasions because of the absence of the parties, and on two occasions because the judge was sitting
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0921JUD001067502
21 septembre 2004
21 septembre 2004
On 20 July 1995 the trial was adjourned because the defendants had failed to appear.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0506DEC002747307
6 mai 2014
6 mai 2014
He claimed that his son had been killed because A.S. and other soldiers had been sent on a mission without weapons.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0623DEC004873799
23 juin 2005
23 juin 2005
They were carrying large amounts of cash, because they intended to purchase goods in Istanbul and resell them in Ukraine.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0510DEC001935402
10 mai 2005
10 mai 2005
A: Because on Saturday we had off and then it was Sunday. ...
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0206JUD006094600
6 février 2007
6 février 2007
His claim for widows’ benefits was made on 16 May 2000 and was rejected on 19 May 2000 on the ground that he was not entitled to widows’ benefits because he was not a woman.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1216DEC001277502
16 décembre 2003
16 décembre 2003
In this connection they submitted that the applicant did enjoy access to a court because he had instituted civil proceedings for damages before the Zagreb Municipal Court.
Source officiellePage 42 sur 1524