CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0622JUD000021304
22 juin 2006
SUR LA VIOLATION ALLÉGUÉE DE L’ARTICLE 1 DU PROTOCOLE N o 1 48.
Page 41 sur 41
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0710JUD005723900
10 juillet 2007
46720/99, 72203/01 and 72552/01, §§ 81-94, ECHR 2005).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1027JUD003539905
27 octobre 2015
§ 1 (5) in relation to Article 70 § 2 of the 1974 CCP).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0802JUD003771097
2 août 2001
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 1 OF PROTOCOL No. 1 48.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0319JUD000024711
19 mars 2020
Rather, according to Articles 262 and 263 of the CPC, the victim’s legal heir had the right to consult the case file only after the proceedings had been terminated. 61.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0617JUD002687608
17 juin 2010
They referred to Articles 3, 5, 6 and 8 of the Convention. 4.
cr
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2016:CR03931
29 juin 2016
Consulter le texte intégral →
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1114DEC004618416
14 novembre 2017
It also argued, relying on Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 taken together with Article 14 of the Convention, on Articles 17 and 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and on Article
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0522JUD003805913
22 mai 2018
provision, as well as Article 8 of the Convention.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0315JUD003103911
15 mars 2016
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 14 OF THE CONVENTION, READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH ARTICLE 8 69.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0622DEC004458098
On 10 March 2004 the applicant lodged a constitutional appeal relying on Articles 14, 15, 22, 23, 26, 30 and 33 of the Constitution as well as on Articles 6 of the Convention and 1 of Protocol