AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-126498
29 août 2013
29 août 2013
In July 2007 the applicant’s ex-wife initiated civil proceedings to deprive him of parental rights over their minor son.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1014DEC002799002
14 octobre 2008
14 octobre 2008
The applicant's wife died on 27 June 1995.
Source officielleCASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CEDH:001-141099
11 septembre 2013
11 septembre 2013
In an interim decision, the District Court granted the applicant and his former wife joint custody and gave the applicant right of contact with his daughter.
Source officielleSOINS PSYCHIATRIQUES
68806d3ebf1211186fbec9af
10 juillet 2025
10 juillet 2025
Chambre des Libertés Individuelles soins psychiatriques ORDONNANCE jeudi 10 juillet 2025 République Française Au nom du Peuple Français N° RG 25/00061 - N° Portalis DBVT-V-B7J-WIZF
Source officiellePRESS;FORTHCOMINGJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1891560-1986547
11 janvier 2007
11 janvier 2007
His wife came to Latvia in 1969 and their daughter was born there.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0228DEC006220800
28 février 2002
28 février 2002
He is represented before the Court by his wife Tatyana Albertovna Labzova. A.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0601DEC005367800
1 juin 2004
1 juin 2004
The national courts' holding that the nation-wide dissemination of this information amounted to a criminal offence is contrary to Article 10, especially taking into account the fact that A.'
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:1207DEC002420994
7 décembre 1994
7 décembre 1994
During and after Yetisen's treatment, the applicant and his wife met other members of the PKK and assisted them.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1974:0530DEC000541672
30 mai 1974
30 mai 1974
It was also mentioned that the child did not even know that the second husband of the applicant's ex-wife was not her father.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-144722
29 novembre 2012
29 novembre 2012
On 25 March 2009 the applicant was at home together with his wife, his son and a neighbour (P. T.).
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0610JUD003835120
10 juin 2025
10 juin 2025
On 14 December 2018 the Disciplinary Board of the Çanakkale prison administration examined a letter sent by the applicant’s wife.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0405JUD003382907
5 avril 2011
5 avril 2011
The applicant's former wife made contact with B impossible for the applicant.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0917DEC005775017
17 septembre 2019
17 septembre 2019
On 24 June 2015 the applicant and his wife had a son, of which they have joint custody. 15.
Source officielleCJUE
ECLI:EU:C:2000:108
7 mars 2000
7 mars 2000
. # The Queen contro Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions, ex parte First Corporate Shipping Ltd, con la partecipazione di: World Wide Fund for Nature UK (WWF) e Avon Wildlife
Source officielleTRIBUNAL_UE
ECLI:EU:T:2023:51
8 février 2023
8 février 2023
#State aid – Aviation sector – Measures implemented by Romania in favour of Timișoara Airport – Measures implemented by Timișoara Airport in favour of Wizz Air and airlines using that airport – Decision
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-1087
20 janvier 2011
20 janvier 2011
While there were statutory exceptions to the system of area-wide hunting, these essentially concerned areas where there was a risk to the general public, nature reserves and land in a specific setting
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-111091
10 avril 2012
10 avril 2012
The applicant and his wife, A.A.C., had a child, A, born on 1 April 2005. In 2006 the couple divorced and the mother was granted custody of the child.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-161084
2 février 2016
2 février 2016
It is obvious to us that Luzhkov and his wife have set a harmful example.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0609DEC003143804
9 juin 2009
9 juin 2009
The applicant was the third wife of the late J.G.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:0527DEC001775191
27 mai 1991
27 mai 1991
His wife is living in insecure and difficult conditions in Sudan. COMPLAINTS 1.
Source officiellePage 41 sur 606