CEDHCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG21
CEDH · CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG — 27 mai 1991
- ECLI
- ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:0527DEC001775191
- Date
- 27 mai 1991
- Publication
- 27 mai 1991
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleStruck out of the list
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.sDD6737AE { font-size:11pt } .s211D6B00 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; line-height:normal; widows:0; orphans:0; font-size:8.5pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial }                            Application No. 17751/91                            by Tesfai EMHAZION                            against Sweden             The European Commission of Human Rights sitting in private on 27 May 1991, the following members being present:   Present:                MM.   C.A. NØRGAARD, President                   J.A. FROWEIN                   S. TRECHSEL                   E. BUSUTTIL                   A.S. GÖZÜBÜYÜK                   A. WEITZEL                   J.C. SOYER                   H.G. SCHERMERS                   H. DANELIUS              Sir   Basil HALL              Mrs.   J. LIDDY              MM.   L. LOUCAIDES                   J.-C. GEUS                   A.V. ALMEIDA RIBEIRO                   M.P. PELLONPÄÄ                   B. MARXER                Mr.   K. ROGGE, Deputy to the Secretary to the Commission.           Having regard to Article 25 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms;           Having regard to the application introduced on 18 January 1991 by Tesfai EMHAZION against Sweden and registered on 4 February 1991 under file No. 17751/91;           Having regard to:   -        the report provided for in Rule 47 of the Rules of Procedure         of the Commission;   -        the applicant's letter of 3 April 1991;           Having deliberated;           Decides as follows:   THE FACTS           The facts of the case, as they have been submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.           The applicant is a Swedish citizen of Ethiopian origin born in 1968.   He is a student resident in Stockholm.   Before the Commission he is represented by Mr.   Jan Axelsson, a lawyer practising in Stockholm.           The applicant is a political refugee from Eritrea.   In 1982 he fled to Sweden, where he was granted asylum.   Since then he has been living in Sweden and has acquired Swedish citizenship.           In April 1990, in Sudan, the applicant contracted marriage with Mrs.   Lemlem Bahta Negash, a woman of Eritrean descent living as a refugee in Sudan.   On 27 November 1990 the Swedish Immigration Board (statens invandrarverk) rejected her request for a residence and work permit, stating that her relationship with the applicant was not sufficiently established.           The applicant has submitted a copy of a marriage certificate issued by the Registrar of Marriages of Sudan on 22 May 1990.   It is not possible for the family to settle in Sudan and, as political refugees, they cannot go back to Ethiopia.   His wife is living in insecure and difficult conditions in Sudan.     COMPLAINTS   1.       The applicant complained that he was prevented from living with his wife.   He alleged a violation of Article 8 of the Convention.   2.       The applicant further complained that there was no remedy before a Swedish authority against the decision by the Immigration Board.   He invoked Article 13 of the Convention.     PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE COMMISSION           The application was introduced on 18 January 1991 and registered on 4 February 1991.           By letter of 3 April 1991 the applicant informed the Commission that on 4 March 1991 his wife had been granted a visa.   He further stated that he wished to withdraw his application.     REASONS FOR THE DECISION           Having regard to Article 30 para. 1 (b) of the Convention the Commission notes that the applicant wishes to withdraw his application since his wife has been granted a visa.   In these circumstances the Commission concludes that the matter has been resolved.   It further considers that no special circumstances affecting the respect for   Human Rights as defined in the Convention require the further examination of the application under Article 30 para. 1 in fine of the Convention.           For these reasons, the Commission, unanimously,             DECIDES TO STRIKE THE APPLICATION OFF ITS LIST OF CASES.              Deputy to the Secretary                    President of the         to the Commission                          Commission                     (K. ROGGE)                           (C.A. NØRGAARD)      Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
- Formation
- 21
- Date
- 27 mai 1991
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:0527DEC001775191
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral