: “If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made

She submitted that she was subjected to verbal harassment from male asylum-seekers, and following the release of her brothers from the transit zone on 7 and 19   February 2019, she felt unprotected

In order to make that claim, a person must be directly affected by the impugned measure: the Convention does not envisage the bringing of an actio popularis for the interpretation of the rights it contains

present applications and that there is no need to give a separate ruling neither on the admissibility nor on the merits of these additional complaints (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin

    After the failure of attempts to reach a friendly settlement, by a letter of 23 November 2012 the Government informed the Court that they proposed to make a unilateral declaration with a

It thus considers there is no need to give a separate ruling on the applicant’s remaining complaints (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v.   Romania   [GC], no.

    The Court observes that the applicant made detailed and specific submissions on the issue of admissibility of the recordings as evidence, their authenticity and reliability, and opposed their

: “If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made

with the use of metal cages (glass cabins) in courtrooms and that there is no need to give a separate ruling on the remaining complaints in this respect (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin

Because the intercepted data did not contain useful information for the criminal investigation, a transcript was never made and no interception material was attached to the criminal case when it had been

Sadigova refuted the Government’s submissions and maintained that they had been aware of the submissions to the Court made by Mr R. Hajili and had signed the relevant documents themselves. 9.

  Petejová, to submit any comments they wished to make. Mr M.   Lipčei was invited to provide an inheritance certificate. 6 .

: “If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made

It thus finds that there is no need to give a separate ruling on these complaints (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v.

A B, à Me Valentin Güner et au préfet de la Marne. Délibéré après l'audience du 9 février 2023, à laquelle siégeaient : Mme Mach, présidente, Mme Castellani, première conseillère, M.

Residence of Third Country Nationals, the asylum authority was required to give an asylum seeker a residence permit on humanitarian grounds within three days from when the request for asylum had been made

In order to make that claim, a person must be directly affected by the impugned measure: the Convention does not envisage the bringing of an actio popularis for the interpretation of the rights it contains

05) against the Russian Federation lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Russian national, Ms Valentina

The prosecutor submitted written comments and made an oral statement inviting the court to dismiss the appeal. The applicant was not informed thereof and could not comment in reply. 40.