CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0620DEC003551997
20 juin 2002
The Regional Court did not deal with the case until 13 September 1994, when the presiding judge ordered the production of a piece of evidence. The trial resumed on 6 October 1994.
Page 41 sur 5384
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0429JUD002360509
29 avril 2014
They also contested the lower court’s interpretation of the law. 21. On 14 November 2007 the Court of Appeal upheld the District Court’s judgment.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-6040
18 janvier 2000
They both also lodged appeals with the Supreme Court to contest their sentences. The Supreme Court rejected the pleas on the basis of the trial transcripts which did not corroborate their complaints.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0309DEC006481201
9 mars 2004
On 8 October 1997 the Tartu Court of Appeal quashed the judgment of the County Court on procedural grounds and remitted the case to it for fresh consideration with a differently constituted court.
soc
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2018:SO00511
28 mars 2018
JL COUR DE CASSATION ______________________ Audience publique du 28 mars 2018 Rejet M.
comm
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2018:CO00517
24 mai 2018
Court que M.
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2020:CO00296
25 mars 2020
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-141034
20 novembre 2013
of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”), Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in this case and to the violation established;
cr
613725d4cd58014677420d5f
17 mars 1998
de Pierre Y... de se prêter à la mise en oeuvre de la suggestion formulée par la mairie, à savoir l'interview de M.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0215DEC003405296
15 février 2001
The court pointed out that several pieces of evidence remained to be taken, including the psychiatric examination of the applicant.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0609JUD004059717
9 juin 2020
She furthermore submitted that the courts in the surrounding region, such as the Zagreb Municipality Court and the Zagreb County Court, had ruled on claims relating to the exhumation and transfer of mortal
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0129DEC000590725
29 janvier 2026
Concerning the latter’s statement, which the applicant had challenged as amounting to hearsay evidence, the Supreme Court pointed to the Constitutional Court’s case-law, according to which the law did
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-205993
15 octobre 2020
(b) In that connection, did the trial court examine and provide adequate reasons in respect of the applicant’s requests by which he asked the trial court to conduct an additional investigation
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-918512-944578
3 février 2004
They also complained of the Court of Appeal’s refusal to hold a hearing or to order a retrial in the District Court.
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2021:CO10265
27 mai 2021
[I] en qualité de cessionnaire du contrat de courtier mandataire de Mme [Z], la cour d'appel n'a pas tiré les conséquences légales de ses constatations et a violé les articles 1147 et 1149 du
1ère Chambre
69df2561cdc6046d47484301
14 avril 2026
Ce magistrat a rendu compte des plaidoiries dans le délibéré de la cour.
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2022:CO00466
7 septembre 2022
PAR CES MOTIFS, et sans qu'il y ait lieu de statuer sur les autres griefs, la Cour : CASSE ET ANNULE, mais seulement en ce que, infirmant le jugement, il condamne la société Pierre Frey à verser à la
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2192740-2341056
27 novembre 2007
With those considerations in mind, the Court took the view that, where there was a plausible, or credible, allegation, piece of evidence or item of information relevant to the identification, and
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2022:CO00603
19 octobre 2022
par la mise en place de « secteurs propres à assurer la viabilité du courtage à court et moyen terme », la gestion des resectorisations devant ainsi « contribuer à l'objectif de doter chaque courtier
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0323DEC005356117
23 mars 2021
The ensuing refusal of the trial court to allow the evidence he had proposed had prevented him from proving a fact that could have led to his acquittal. The Court’s assessment 23.