CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0902DEC003278308
2 septembre 2014
Germany , no. 41604/98, § 31, ECHR 2005 ‑ IV with further references, and Niemietz v.
Page 41 sur 630
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-702653-711522
20 février 2003
After German reunification, ownership of the land passed to the Institute for the Sugar and Starch Industry, which had in the meantime become the property of the Federal Republic of Germany (FRG).
PRESS;FORTHCOMINGJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-3210186-3613932
26 août 2010
Germany (no. 46344/06) The applicant, Rüdiger Rumpf, is a German national who was born in 1951 and lives in Ingelheim (Germany).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0531DEC003328912
31 mai 2016
The German Government (“the Government”) were represented by one of their Agents, Mr H. J. Behrens.
PRESS;HEARINGS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1477615-1544911
12 octobre 2005
The applicant The applicant, Ismet Sejdovic, is a national of former Yugoslavia who was born in 1972 and lives in Hamburg (Germany).
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0710JUD004831110
10 juillet 2014
Because the early elections could not be held until the Bundestag (German Federal Parliament) had been dissolved – a process which could only take place by order of Federal President of Germany after a
PRESS;FORTHCOMINGHEARINGS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2012802-2123362
25 mai 2007
France, Germany and Norway The applicant is Ruzhdi Saramati who was born in 1950. He is from Kosovo and of Albanian origin.
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-106899
14 septembre 2011
Appendix to Resolution CM/ResDH(2011)113 Information about the measures to comply with the judgment in the case of Freitag against Germany Introductory case summary This case
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-12029
26 juillet 2018
Germany , 20578/07 , 21 December 2010; and Schneider v.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0624DEC003118404
24 juin 2008
The Government of Germany did not make use of their right to intervene (Article 36 § 1 of the Convention). A.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0322DEC001672210
22 mars 2016
In 1995 the Conference on Jewish Material Claims against Germany, Inc.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1987:1212DEC001223086
12 décembre 1987
against the Federal Republic of Germany
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CEDH:001-140801
5 décembre 2013
Germany (No. 53126/07) and G. v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1210DEC005379209
10 décembre 2013
Germany , no. 23541/94, § 42, 13 February 2001).
ECLI:CEDH:002-9912
16 décembre 1992
Germany - 12129/86 Judgment 16.12.1992 Article 6 Article 6-1 Access to court Alleged denial of access to a court: no violation [This summary is extracted from the Court’s official reports (Series A or
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0531DEC003139609
31 mai 2010
page-break-after:avoid } .sACC481A8 { width:192.94pt; display:inline-block } .sA2E62387 { width:204.97pt; display:inline-block } FIFTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 31396/09 by Jörn IPSEN against Germany
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-187784
26 octobre 2018
; text-transform:uppercase } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } Communicated on 26 October 2018 FIFTH SECTION Application no. 22906/18 Frank Alexander SIMONIS against Germany
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-49207
28 juin 1968
Having regard to the report drawn up by the European Commission of Human Rights in accordance with Article 31 (art. 31) of the Convention, relating to the application lodged by Heinz Zeidler-Kornmann, a German
ECLI:CEDH:001-212830
30 septembre 2021
page-break-after:avoid; font-size:7pt } .sA1D3DA2E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } Published on 18 October 2021 THIRD SECTION Application no. 8964/18 AXEL SPRINGER SE against Germany
ECLI:CEDH:002-3540
19 mai 2009
His route took him through Greece and Germany.