#Dumping – Dovoz některých za tepla válcovaných ocelových plechů a svitků zasílaných z Turecka – Rozšíření konečného antidumpingového cla, které bylo uloženo na některé za tepla válcované ocelové plechy

#Codice doganale comunitario - Regolamento (CE) n. 384/96 - Difesa contro le importazioni oggetto di dumping da parte di paesi non membri della Comunità europea - Regolamento (CE, Euratom) n. 2988/95 -

#Dumping – Hiinast pärit keraamiliste plaatide import – Määruse (EÜ) nr 1225/2009 artikli 11 lõiked 4 ja 5 ning artikkel 17 (nüüd määruse (EL) 2016/1036 artikli 11 lõiked 4 ja 5 ning artikkel 17) – Keeldumine

MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the complaint under Article 3 of the Convention brought by the applicant who was serving a prison sentence at the time, of him being placed in a metal cage during

Moreover, the applicant had not made any admissions during the period when access to a lawyer was being denied.

During the first interview with his solicitor, a policeman was present.

Gottfried Niemietz, a German national, who complained that his right to respect for his home and correspondence had been violated during a search of his office;        Recalling

SECOND SECTION Application no. 73727/11 Oğuzhan DİNÇ against Turkey lodged on 4 November 2011 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The applicant, who was a minor at the time of the events in 2009, was injured during

Turkey , no. 28439/03, 23 March 2010) It further pertains to the admissibility and the subsequent use by the criminal courts of the evidence obtained during the investigation stage to secure the applicant

The applicant complains under Article 3 of the Convention that he was ill-treated by the police during his arrest and that no effective investigation has been conducted into his allegations.

A medical report drawn up on 24 November 2016 during his custody noted a redness on his right cheek.

The applicant alleges that during the above-mentioned raid he was physically assaulted by police officers, laid down and handcuffed, even though he did not resist the arrest.

Pursuant to an order of the SIZO governor of 11   August 2003, during his trial the applicant had received hot lunches organised on the court premises by officer K. during the weeks in which more

Detention during Her Majesty’s pleasure 27.

Furthermore, during the two days of his stay in the hospital, they refused to give him food and water. 19 .

Accordingly, he was not assisted by a lawyer during that investigative measure. 14.

[It was determined] that his illness had been acquired during his military service.

He asserted that he had been ill-treated during his interrogation.