AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-211973
31 août 2021
31 août 2021
Was the partial non-enforcement of the Supreme Court’s final judgment of 15 June 2001 contrary to Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-207901
11 janvier 2021
11 janvier 2021
QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his family life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention, in the light of the alleged protracted and ineffective
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-162152
21 mars 2016
21 mars 2016
QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant company’s right to freedom of expression, contrary to Article 10 of the Convention?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-214275
17 novembre 2021
17 novembre 2021
QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Was the applicant subjected to treatment contrary to Article 3 of the Convention as a result of “dangerous detainee” regime imposed on him between 26 August 2018 and 14 April 2020
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-214568
5 décembre 2021
5 décembre 2021
Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for her family life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention? 2.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-177766
19 septembre 2017
19 septembre 2017
Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his private life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention, having regard to the States’ positive obligation under Article
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-217832
18 mai 2022
18 mai 2022
QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicants’ right to freedom of peaceful assembly, contrary to Article 11 of the Convention ( Kudrevičius and Others v.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-202688
3 avril 2020
3 avril 2020
If these provisions are applicable to the facts of which the applicant complains, has the applicant suffered discrimination contrary to Article 14 of the Convention, read in conjunction with
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-189907
15 janvier 2019
15 janvier 2019
QUESTION tO THE PARTIES Has the applicant suffered discrimination, on the grounds of her residency, in the enjoyment of her rights guaranteed by the domestic law on local elections, contrary to Article
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-207912
15 janvier 2021
15 janvier 2021
Did the prosecution’s actions reveal a discriminatory attitude towards persons with mental disabilities, contrary to Article 14 of the Convention taken in conjunction with Article 3 and/or
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-194112
29 mai 2019
29 mai 2019
Did guards in Sofia Prison subject the applicant to treatment contrary to Article 3 of the Convention on 17 October 2013?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-199018
14 novembre 2019
14 novembre 2019
QUESTION TO THE PARTIES In view of the applicant’s extradition to the United States of America, was he exposed to the risk of treatment contrary to Article 3 of the Convention?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-234725
7 juin 2024
7 juin 2024
QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his private life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention, through the refusal to allow the applicant
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-196827
20 septembre 2019
20 septembre 2019
Was the applicant subjected to discrimination based on her disability, contrary to the requirements of Article 14 taken in conjunction with Article 3 and/or 8?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-187548
11 octobre 2018
11 octobre 2018
Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for her family life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention, having regard to the failure of the authorities of the respondent
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-228915
19 octobre 2023
19 octobre 2023
In this connection, did he suffer discrimination contrary to Article 14 of the Convention read in conjunction with Article 3? 2.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-225057
2 mai 2023
2 mai 2023
According to the applicant, the said decision of 9 June 2015 is contrary to Sections 4 and 5 of the Court Fee Act of 8 July 2011 imposing no court fee on this type of claims and the Higher
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-199512
25 novembre 2019
25 novembre 2019
Has the applicant suffered discrimination in the enjoyment of her Convention rights as a result of her ethnic origin, contrary to Article 14 of the Convention, in conjunction with Article
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-111257
15 mai 2012
15 mai 2012
xa0; Has the applicant suffered discrimination in the enjoyment of his Convention rights on the ground of the dismissal of his request for the award of the benefit for exposure to radiation, contrary
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-198327
9 octobre 2019
9 octobre 2019
Has the applicant suffered discrimination in the enjoyment of his rights under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1, contrary to Article 14 of the Convention?
Source officiellePage 41 sur 1005