CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV

20 088 résultats pour « Conerardy »

Tous
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
CC
CE
TA
CAA
CA
CPH
TJ
TCOM
CJUE
Prud'h.
Conv. coll.
BOFIP
IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-211973

Admin. suprême

31 août 2021

31 août 2021

    Was the partial non-enforcement   of the Supreme Court’s final judgment of 15   June 2001 contrary to Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1?

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-207901

Admin. suprême

11 janvier 2021

11 janvier 2021

  QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his family life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention, in the light of the alleged protracted and ineffective

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-162152

Admin. suprême

21 mars 2016

21 mars 2016

QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant company’s right to freedom of expression, contrary to Article 10 of the Convention?

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-214275

Admin. suprême

17 novembre 2021

17 novembre 2021

QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Was the applicant subjected to treatment contrary to Article 3 of the Convention as a result of “dangerous detainee” regime imposed on him between 26 August 2018 and 14 April 2020

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-214568

Admin. suprême

5 décembre 2021

5 décembre 2021

    Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for her family life, contrary to Article   8 of the Convention?   2.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-177766

Admin. suprême

19 septembre 2017

19 septembre 2017

    Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his private life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention, having regard to the States’ positive obligation under Article

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-217832

Admin. suprême

18 mai 2022

18 mai 2022

  QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicants’ right to freedom of peaceful assembly, contrary to Article   11 of the Convention ( Kudrevičius and Others v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-202688

Admin. suprême

3 avril 2020

3 avril 2020

    If these provisions are applicable to the facts of which the applicant complains, has the applicant suffered discrimination contrary to Article 14 of the Convention, read in conjunction with

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-189907

Admin. suprême

15 janvier 2019

15 janvier 2019

QUESTION tO THE PARTIES Has the applicant suffered discrimination, on the grounds of her residency, in the enjoyment of her rights guaranteed by the domestic law on local elections, contrary to Article

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-207912

Admin. suprême

15 janvier 2021

15 janvier 2021

    Did the prosecution’s actions reveal a discriminatory attitude towards persons with mental disabilities, contrary to Article 14 of the Convention taken in conjunction with Article 3 and/or

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-194112

Admin. suprême

29 mai 2019

29 mai 2019

    Did guards in Sofia Prison subject the applicant to treatment contrary to Article 3 of the Convention on 17 October 2013?

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-199018

Admin. suprême

14 novembre 2019

14 novembre 2019

QUESTION TO THE PARTIES In view of the applicant’s extradition to the United States of America, was he exposed to the risk of treatment contrary to Article 3 of the Convention?

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-234725

Admin. suprême

7 juin 2024

7 juin 2024

QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his private life, contrary to Article   8 of the Convention, through the refusal to allow the applicant

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-196827

Admin. suprême

20 septembre 2019

20 septembre 2019

    Was the applicant subjected to discrimination based on her disability, contrary to the requirements of Article 14 taken in conjunction with Article 3 and/or 8?

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-187548

Admin. suprême

11 octobre 2018

11 octobre 2018

    Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for her family life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention, having regard to the failure of the authorities of the respondent

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-228915

Admin. suprême

19 octobre 2023

19 octobre 2023

In this connection, did he suffer discrimination contrary to Article 14 of the Convention read in conjunction with Article 3?   2.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-225057

Admin. suprême

2 mai 2023

2 mai 2023

According to the applicant, the said decision of 9   June 2015 is contrary to Sections 4 and 5 of the Court Fee Act of 8   July 2011 imposing no court fee on this type of claims and the Higher

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-199512

Admin. suprême

25 novembre 2019

25 novembre 2019

    Has the applicant suffered discrimination in the enjoyment of her Convention rights as a result of her ethnic origin, contrary to Article 14 of the Convention, in conjunction with Article

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-111257

Admin. suprême

15 mai 2012

15 mai 2012

xa0;   Has the applicant suffered discrimination in the enjoyment of his Convention rights on the ground of the dismissal of his request for the award of the benefit for exposure to radiation, contrary

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-198327

Admin. suprême

9 octobre 2019

9 octobre 2019

    Has the applicant suffered discrimination in the enjoyment of his rights under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1, contrary to Article 14 of the Convention?

Source officielle

Page 41 sur 1005

← PrécédentSuivant →