hearing held on 3 November 1997 the applicant company had asked the court to introduce as party in the trial a State authority called the State Property Fund (“FPS”) from which it had acquired the shares

She is represented before the Court by Mr Trajče Torov, a lawyer practising in Štip. A.

The Bank of Slovenia’s measures and past attempts to provide a remedy to former holders of cancelled bonds and shares 6 .

A certain share of the trap units is reserved for professional fishermen.

    During their detention in police custody, on 30 January 2003 Havil   Adırbelli, Metin Goran, Ali Nas, Beşir Gasyak and Resul Kervanoğlu had a meeting with their representative, Mr Elçi

Landgerichtsrat M is challenged because of his share in the decisions on detention, with which in any case he has identified himself."

  166, sheet plan XXXI/4, registration no. A196; - plot no. 168, sheet plan XXXI/4, registration no.   A197; - plot no. 170, sheet plan XXXI/4, registration no.

    The applicant is a company limited by shares with its seat in Budapest. 6.

The interference is rather to be regarded as a control of the use of his property within the meaning of the second paragraph of that provision.

When living with the children in Makhachkala, contrary to her parents' will, she did not refrain from regularly attending the meetings of the 'Jehovah's Witnesses'.

; -     on increasing the joint-stock company’s authorised capital by means of issuing additional ordinary shares; -     on addressing a petition to a creditors’ meeting to include

    The Court notes that the applications are not manifestly ill ‑ founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention.

At that time the applicant company was owned by ten shareholders, each owning between 25.1% and 0.9% of the shares.

    The Court notes that this complaint is not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 of the Convention.

She was represented before the Court by   S.

établi entre la société Albingia et la société Comet le 23 mars 1989 avait permis de régler le litige par le versement d'une somme de 877 000 francs pour solde de tout compte au profit de la société Shee

Each of the parties was the holder of 50% of the company's shares.

    Did the applicant have a “possession” within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention?

According to K., she had been in the possession of six shares (corresponding to 50 per cent of the share capital) of Kallas AS, a public limited company, which had been unlawfully transformed into the