39 of the Rules of Court and the fact that this interim measure has been complied with, Having regard to the decision to grant priority to the above application under Rule 41 of the Rules of Court, Having

the lawyer who would represent her (Rule 30), to whom the President gave leave to use the Turkish language (Rule 27 para. 3).

The rule of confidentiality, set in Article 39 § 2 of the Convention and Rule 62 § 2 of the Rules of Court, should be interpreted having these facts in mind. 23.

101 paragraph 1 line 5 of the Rules of the Constitutional Court due to the violation of Rule 94 paragraph 2 of the Rules of the Constitutional Court for the following reasons: VII.1.

    The application was allocated to the Second Section of the Court (Rule   52 § 1 of the Rules of Court).

    Rule 36 of the Rules of Court reads, in the relevant part: “1.

         On 13 July 1989 the Commission considered the admissibility of the application and decided, pursuant to the then Rule 42 para. 2 (a) of its Rules of Procedure (now

    The application was allocated to the Second Section of the Court (Rule 52 § 1 of the Rules of Court).

submitted by the applicant, Having regard to the decision of 24 March 2015 to lift the interim measure under Rule 39 of the Rules of Court, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS 1.

    The application was allocated to the Third Section of the Court (Rule   52 § 1 of the Rules of Court).

The Government accordingly requested a revision of the judgment under Rule 80 of the Rules of Court. 4.

The President of the Chamber acceded to the applicant’s request not to have her name disclosed (Rule 47 § 3 of the Rules of Court). 3.

The President of the Chamber decided, ex officio , that the applicants’ identities should not be disclosed (Rules 33 § 1 and 47 § 3 of the Rules of Court).

Rozakis, the judge elected in respect of Greece (Article   27 § 2 of the Convention and Rule 24 § 4 of the Rules of Court), Mr L. Wildhaber, the President of the Court, Mrs E.

On 15 March 2021 the Court decided to indicate to the respondent Government, under Rule 39 of the Rules of Court, that the applicant should not be removed from Russia for the duration of the proceedings

Chamber;   Whereas under the above-mentioned friendly settlement it was agreed that the Government of The Netherlands would pay the applicant, the sum of 6   000 euros;   Recalling that Rule

In the choice between the single-publication rule and the Internet publication rule, these competing interests should be balanced.

He accordingly requested revision of the judgment within the meaning of Rule 80 of the Rules of Court. 4.

The application was allocated to the First Section of the Court (Rule   52 §   1 of the Rules of Court).