On 7 March 2001, the Labour Court rejected the Industries’ claims.   2.

The applicant in application no. 8040/06 complained under Article 6 of the Convention that the domestic courts were biased and did nothing to resolve labour disputes in Slovenia.

Monsieur et Madame X et de Mesdames X et X, a saisi la commission d'accès aux documents administratifs, par courrier enregistré à son secrétariat le 25 mai 2016, à la suite du refus opposé par le maire de Lagord

antérieure : L'association " Uzège - Pont du Gard durable " a demandé au tribunal administratif de Nîmes l'annulation de la délibération du 28 octobre 2020 par laquelle le conseil municipal de Serviers-et-Labaume

représentée par Me Marie Jeanne MOUDOULAUD, avocat au barreau de LIMOGES substitué par Me Corinne DHAEZE-LABOUDIE, avocat au barreau de LIMOGES DEMANDERESSE à la rectification d'erreur portant sur un

A..., représenté par Me Dhaeze Laboudie demande au tribunal : 1°) d’annuler la décision du 30 avril 2025 par laquelle le préfet de Lot-et-Garonne a refusé de lui délivrer un passeport ; 2°) d’enjoindre

    On 15 January 2014 the applicant company brought proceedings in the Budapest Administrative and Labour Court challenging the ranking decision.

At the last hearing, the (renamed) Ljubljana Labour and Social Court ( Delovno in socialno sodišče v Ljubljani ) decided to deliver a written judgment.

    Following the applicant’s declaration of 16 February 2000, as of 6 July 2000 the case was conducted as a labour dispute and was examined by the Labour Court. 11.

A subsequent official check carried out by the Labour Inspectorate on 10 June 2019 focused on reviewing official employment documents and concluded that there was no labour agreement in respect of the

reached in the course of resolution of a collective labour dispute...”

LABOURE, demeurant ... ; M.

AU NOM DU PEUPLE FRANCAIS LA COUR DE CASSATION, CHAMBRE COMMERCIALE, FINANCIERE ET ECONOMIQUE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : I - Sur le pourvoi n° N 98-30.188 formé par la société Imprimerie Laborde,

D’APPEL DE BORDEAUX TRIBUNAL JUDICIAIRE DE BORDEAUX N° RG 26/01001 - N° Portalis DBX6-W-B7K-3TFX ORDONNANCE DU 07 Avril 2026 A l’audience publique du 07 Avril 2026, devant Nous, Isabelle LAFOND

CASE The application concerns the refusal by the State authorities to provide the applicant with pension, which she was allegedly entitled to in accordance with Articles 7 and 21.2.4 of the Law on Labour

They have never received a residence permit card in Greece, without which, so the applicant claims, she and her children will not have access to housing, the labour market, social security/welfare and

She initiated proceedings before the Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs for “administrative inactivity” ( молчење на администрацијата ), in which she complained that the authorities had not issued an

The applicant disagreed, arguing that the constitutional complaint, preceded by a burdensome labour litigation, would not have been an effective remedy. 14.

On 20 September 1993 the applicant made further claims, as he considered that the sums paid by the Federal Labour Ministry between 1   January 1991 and 31 May 1993 were significantly less than the