Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0907DEC004076119
7 septembre 2021
7 septembre 2021
On 6 November 2014 the Court of Magistrates as a court of criminal judicature, and on appeal on 18 February 2016 the Criminal Court of Appeal, confirmed the applicant’s guilt for, inter alia
Source officielle5ème chambre sociale PH
éclaré se désister de l'appel dirigéc/S.A
63b91aceb63d827c909cacac
6 janvier 2023
6 janvier 2023
Prud'hommes - Formation paritaire de NIMES, section IN, décision attaquée en date du 27 Octobre 2021, enregistrée sous le n° 21/00311 Monsieur [O] [V] [Adresse 3] [Localité 1] Représentant : Me Céline GUILLE
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-6970
12 mai 2000
12 mai 2000
The applicant pleaded not guilty, although he admitted that his voice was one of those recorded.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-112380
4 juillet 2012
4 juillet 2012
By the final judgment of 12 July 2000 the Military Division of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation found the applicant guilty as charged and sentenced him to fifteen years of imprisonment.
Source officielleTribunal Administratif de Lille
DTA_2207377_20221019
19 octobre 2022
19 octobre 2022
Par un mémoire en défense, enregistré le 12 octobre 2022, la commune de Tourcoing, représentée par Me Guillier et Me Bidault, conclut au rejet de la requête et à la mise à charge de la requérante de la
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0706DEC003640897
6 juillet 1999
6 juillet 1999
The applicant pleaded not guilty and was tried before Hutton LCJ sitting without a jury.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0909DEC003090002
9 septembre 2003
9 septembre 2003
In summing up he must warn the jury that absence is not an admission of guilt and adds nothing to the prosecution case.”
Source officielle5e chambre civile
6538b3d27ffc2c8318ee003f
24 octobre 2023
24 octobre 2023
de la SCP SCP RECHE-GUILLE MEGHABBAR, avocat au barreau de CARCASSONNE Madame [S] [M] épouse [I] née le [Date naissance 11] 1944 à [Localité 17] [Adresse 21] [Localité 7] Représentée par Me Gaëlle
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0608DEC003877115
8 juin 2021
8 juin 2021
On 10 April 2014 the Pula Minor Offences Court found the applicant guilty of speeding on 20 November 2013 and fined him HRK 4,500.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0911DEC003196796
11 septembre 1997
11 septembre 1997
his having had the opportunity of exercising his rights of defence, a judicial decision concerning him reflects an opinion that he is guilty.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0925DEC003012802
25 septembre 2007
25 septembre 2007
On 21 September 2000 the Łodź Regional Court found the applicant guilty of robbery. It sentenced him to three years and six months’ imprisonment.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1121DEC001416103
21 novembre 2006
21 novembre 2006
Everyone charged with a criminal offence shall be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law. 3.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-3506
15 décembre 2005
15 décembre 2005
The same judges then had taken the decision to prosecute him, had tried the issues arising from his conduct, had determined his guilt and had imposed the sanction (a term of imprisonment) on him.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68388-68856
20 mars 2001
20 mars 2001
out following a friendly settlement in which the Netherlands Government have expressed their “deepest regret at the death of Mr Hüseyin Köksal” and agreed to pay the applicants 140,000 Netherlands guilders
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-114716
26 octobre 2012
26 octobre 2012
On 4 May 2006 the Vostochny District Court found the applicant guilty of aggravated robbery; the court referred, inter alia, to the applicant’s confession and statement of 18 November 2005 and the victim
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-11493
17 janvier 2017
17 janvier 2017
On conclusion of the trial the applicants were found guilty and sentenced to fifteen and twenty-five years’ imprisonment respectively.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-10159
16 septembre 2014
16 septembre 2014
36/2002 and by UNCLOS, and declared him guilty as charged. An appeal on points of law by the applicant was dismissed.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-180972
22 janvier 2018
22 janvier 2018
In a judgment of 10 June 2010 the Sofia District Court (hereinafter “the District Court”) found the applicant guilty of defamation, aggravated on two grounds, namely since it had been made through the
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2746821-3000693
2 juin 2009
2 juin 2009
Human Rights, on account of the statements of the deputy director of the Office of the Finance Police having implied, at the very initial stages of criminal investigation, that Mr Borovský had been guilty
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-186345
31 août 2018
31 août 2018
#xa0; November 1973 of the Court of Magistrates as a court of criminal judicature, confirmed on appeal by a judgment of the Criminal Court of Appeal of 28 March 1974, the applicant was found guilty
Source officiellePage 40 sur 692