allegedly breached the principle of presumption of innocence by stating that the applicant had committed the offences he was accused of and by referring to other ongoing criminal proceedings in which his guilt

Law : Article 6(2) – The refusal to compensate the applicant for the prison sentence he had served, before his conviction was quashed, had been based on his supposed guilt or lack of “total certainty as

implicit rejection of the submissions inviting it to call four witnesses - not the Court's function to express an opinion on the relevance of the evidence thus offered and rejected or on the applicant's guilt

held that there had been a breach of Article 10 (art. 10) of the Convention;     - held that the respondent state was to pay the applicant association, within three months, 60 000 Dutch guilders

  In particular, in the judgment concerning B, did the court make it sufficiently clear that it was not also implicitly determining the applicant’s guilt, so as to avoid, as far as possible, giving

GUILLAS La République mande et ordonne au ministre de l'intérieur et des outre-mer en ce qui le concerne ou à tous commissaires de justice à ce requis en ce qui concerne les voies de droit commun contre

GUILLAS La République mande et ordonne au ministre de l'intérieur et des outre-mer en ce qui le concerne ou à tous commissaires de justice à ce requis en ce qui concerne les voies de droit commun contre

GUILLAS La République mande et ordonne au ministre de l'intérieur, en ce qui le concerne ou à tous huissiers de justice à ce requis en ce qui concerne les voies de droit commun contre les parties privées

This statement was widely cited in different printed media and TV-programmes implying M.B.’s (V.B.’s son) guilt in causing the traffic accident.

courts, to role of Court of Appeal, to nature of issues submitted to it – which included serious questions regarding both facts and application of law and in particular the issue of the defendants' guilt

violation of Article 8 (art. 8);   - held unanimously that there had been no violation of Article 3 (art. 3);   - held unanimously that the Netherlands was to pay to the applicants 20 000 Dutch guilders

B..., représentée par Me Guillier, demande au tribunal : 1°) d’annuler la décision du 22 juillet 2025 par laquelle le préfet de police a refusé de lui délivrer un récépissé

    An inference from failure to give evidence cannot on its own prove guilt. That is expressly stated in section 38(3) of the Act. 4.

If liberty is refused simply because of the strong suspicion of guilt it violates the concept of the presumption of innocence enshrined in Article 6 (art. 6).

Unfair weight was given to the applicant's silence, the drawing of inferences playing a crucial and determinative role in the findings of guilt.   35.

A   finding of guilt in the absence of a final conviction must be distinguished, in that context, from the description of a “state of suspicion”.

This did not amount to an admission of guilt.

As for the rest, it remained unconvinced that the applicant’s guilt had been proven with the required level of certainty.