He submitted that, according to the Hague Convention of 12th June, 1902, (acceded to by Germany in 1904, by Poland and Danzig in 1929) and to German law (Article 19 of the Introductory Act to the Civil

Germany (see Eckardt v.

This principle applies to the Federal Republic of Germany in respect of wrongs or damage caused by the German Reich (see   Associazione Nazionale Reduci Dalla Prigionia dall'Internamento e  

Germany (dec.) - 52442/99 Decision 2.3.2000 [Section IV] Article 14 Discrimination Difference in treatment of civil servants from the former GDR with regard to retirement pensions: inadmissible From 1966

September 2014, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the case, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The applicant, Mr Alfred Bauer, is a German

font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt }     FIFTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 8733/15 Klaus FUHRMANN against Germany

       In these circumstances, the Commission is satisfied that the German courts examined the applicant's health and conduct with sufficient care.

    Background to the case The applicant association is the German branch of the animal rights organisation PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals).

At the time the application was lodged he lived in Erlenbach in Germany. He currently resides in Swidnica in Poland. 1.     The applicant’s situation in Germany 9.

    The German proceedings 12.

A non-national lawyer could intervene in proceedings in Germany only by working together with a German colleague, a restriction to which German lawyers were, of course, not subject.

Germany judgment of 25 August 1987, Series A no. 123, p. 25, para. 60; Englert v. Germany judgment of 25 August 1987, Series A no. 123, pp. 54-55, para. 37; Nölkenbockhoff v.

  Germany (no. 19359/04, §§ 45-78, ECHR 2009) and Glien v. Germany (no. 7345/12, §§ 32-52, 28 November 2013).

In September 1977 the book was published in the Federal Republic of Germany (FRG).

Until his emigration to Germany in February 1984 the applicant lived and worked in Katowice (Poland).

  His wife is Turkish and they have three children, two of whom were born in the Federal Republic of Germany.   The family is living is Ingolstadt.

lodged on 31 December 2013 STATEMENT OF FACTS The applicant, Ms Waltraud Storck, is a German national, who was born in 1958 and lives in Hünfelden-Kirberg (Germany).

Germany, Waite and Kennedy v. Germany [GC], no. 26083/94 , §   51, ECHR 1999 ‑ I, and Streletz, Kessler and Krenz v. Germany [GC], nos. 34044/96, 35532/97, 44801/98, § 49, ECHR 2001-II).

In 1999, it requested information from the Foreign Office of the Federal Republic of Germany regarding the question whether Philippine courts recognise divorce judgments of German courts.