CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1125JUD000594719
25 novembre 2021
The reports from child welfare services showed, in the District Court’s view, that the child welfare services had had concerns about the emotional care that the applicant had supplied to X.
Page 40 sur 385
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0207JUD002876812
7 février 2017
Abduction of the child and proceedings to enforce access rights 14. On 16 January 2007 M.K. moved to Germany with the child without the applicant’s consent.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0831DEC001853591
31 août 1992
The result in the present case is that a child remains legally bound to a father who is not the real father and from whom the child can expect nothing, whereas the child is denied a legal relationship
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-7427
19 février 2013
Adoption could therefore not serve to create a parent-child relationship between the first applicant and the child in addition to the relationship with his mother.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1986:1015DEC001146885
15 octobre 1986
that the court is satisfied that conditions of risk apply to the child.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1987:0708JUD001049683
8 juillet 1987
(a) Reception of a child into care 41.
ECLI:CEDH:002-11758
30 novembre 2017
Concerned about her parenting skills, the child welfare authorities obtained an emergency care order and the child was placed with foster parents. The authorities later obtained a full care order.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-237359
9 septembre 2024
Judge D.C. suggested to X. that he should request custody of the child and that the daughter should not live with the applicant because of her sexual orientation.
ECLI:CEDH:001-226191
5 juillet 2023
In 2022 the courts dismissed the applicant’s request for contact rights with the child and for information on the latter’s development.
ECLI:CEDH:002-10447
26 mai 1994
The fact that Irish law permitted the secret placement of the child for adoption without the applicant's knowledge or consent amounted to an interference. 2.
2ème Chambre
DTA_2303191_20231009
9 octobre 2023
B, - les observations de Me Bizzari, substituant Me Couronne, représentant les communes de Chailly-lès-Ennery et Charly-Oradour. Considérant ce qui suit : 1. M.
ECLI:CEDH:002-3334
18 mai 2006
The applicant had no more contact with the child but sought to have his paternity recognised in law.
ECLI:CEDH:002-4838
26 juin 2003
The child was recognised by the natural father and the court discontinued the proceedings.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0904DEC002637695
4 septembre 1996
shall order the return of the child forthwith."
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1210JUD001537916
10 décembre 2021
It is our assessment that we cannot protect the child sufficiently within the structure of our institution, and we also find that the child is suffering.”
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1006JUD002328008
6 octobre 2016
She considered that the child enjoyed contact with his father. However, both parents tended to instrumentalise the child in the pursuit of their own interests. They did not communicate.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1115JUD002513320
15 novembre 2022
The Child Protection Act no. 80/2002 sets out the framework for child protection work.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0213JUD004232698
13 février 2003
The child bringing the action shall be required to prove that he or she is the child to whom the alleged mother gave birth.
CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0831REP001642490
31 août 1993
with the child and his parent or by a court decision.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0911DEC000660005
11 septembre 2007
It had not been possible to keep the child out of these conflicts, as the parents were unable to accept that the child remained with the foster family.