LA COUR DE CASSATION, PREMIERE CHAMBRE CIVILE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Sur le pourvoi formé par Monsieur Auguste X., en cassation d'un arrêt rendu le 28 juin 1985, par la cour d'appel de Rennes

A B, conteste le refus d'embauche qui lui a été opposé par le collège Auguste Dédé. Vu les autres pièces du dossier. Vu le code de justice administrative. Considérant ce qui suit : 1.

font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase }   Communicated on 9   April 2018 and 4 December 2018   FIFTH SECTION Application no. 54151/11 Jabbar SAVALANLI against Azerbaijan lodged on 23 August

Louis Auguste Y..., a hérité au décès du père des indivisaires, M.

s25D5DE94 { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:7pt } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } Published on 25 August

On 8 August 2014 the Reutov Town Court of the Moscow Region held that the applicant was entitled to half the sum on the above euro bank account and awarded her 9,320.40 Russian roubles.

2006   The European Court of Human Rights will be notifying in writing seven Chamber judgments on Thursday 3 August 2006.

QUESTIONS tO THE PARTIES Was the applicant deprived of his liberty on 16 August 2016 between 10   a.m. and 4.30 p.m.?

In particular, on 9 August 2020, upon her return from Turkey to Georgia, the applicant was placed in a designated hotel for quarantine – a measure imposed in the context of the COVID-19 health pandemic

ALBERT AUGUSTE, CONTRE UN ARRET DE LA COUR D'APPEL DE RIOM, CHAMBRE DES APPELS CORRECTIONNELS, EN DATE DU 4 JUIN 1981, QUI, POUR INFRACTION A L'INTERDICTION BANCAIRE D'EMETTRE DES CHEQUES, L'A CONDAMNE

Regarding the second phase of the proceedings (March 2010 to August 2011), the Federal Court of Justice considered that it could be left open whether the length of the proceedings was excessive, as the

In August 2004, the applicant was charged with fraud in Armenia and his name was placed on the list of fugitives from justice.

Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as "the Convention"),   Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of E. against Norway delivered on 29 August

On 29 July 2022 the St Pölten Regional Court summoned the parties to a hearing scheduled for 22 August 2022 and ordered the applicant to bring a list of assets.

The applicant complained under Article 3 of the Convention about the inadequate conditions of detention served between 12 August 2013 and 31   July 2014 and between 25 August 2014 and 15 November

administrative : 1°) d'ordonner l'expulsion sans délai de Mme A B du logement qu'elle occupe sans droit ni titre au sein du centre d'hébergement et de réinsertion sociale MAAVAR situé au 45 avenue Philippe Auguste

On 18   August 2016 he had a meeting with his lawyer, which was monitored by prison officers.

On 6 November 1997 the Court of Appeal dismissed an application for extradition lodged by the German authorities in August 1996 on the ground that the applicant was the subject of criminal proceedings

    On 20 August 2009 police officers started to question the applicant about the distribution of child pornography.

Pubic event of 29 August 2014 On 29 August 2014 the applicant held a public event against corruption.