CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

4 294 résultats pour « Atiback »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-11553

Admin. suprême

20 juin 2017

20 juin 2017

Law – Article 8: In order for Article   8 to come into play, the attack on personal reputation had to attain a certain level of seriousness and had to have been carried out in a manner causing prejudice

Source officielle

Page 40 sur 215

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0411DEC004446216

Admin. suprême

11 avril 2024

11 avril 2024

Having regard to the Court’s decisions striking out the applications against Ukraine in which there was a lack of communication with certain applicants since the full ‑ scale military attack launched

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-7168

Admin. suprême

10 octobre 2000

10 octobre 2000

Moreover, the applicants were unequivocal in their account and the Government have not suggested that the gendarmes’ intervention was considered necessary to quell a riot or a planned attack.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-219831

Admin. suprême

3 mai 2022

3 mai 2022

Ukraine (communicated on 5 January 2018). [1] The applicants were arrested on 31 August 2015 and remanded in custody on suspicion of involvement in a lethal terrorist bombing attack near the Parliament

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-149

Admin. suprême

21 février 2012

21 février 2012

The courts also considered that the applicant’s letters had formed an unjustified personal attack and that the expressions used, such as “liar”, “greedy and mendacious person” and “dishonest”, could have

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-578

Admin. suprême

29 mars 2011

29 mars 2011

Without precise and specific regulation of preventive restrictions on freedom of expression, many individuals fearing attacks against them in television programmes – announced in advance – might apply

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-231665

Admin. suprême

23 février 2024

23 février 2024

As result of shooting between police officers and the attackers M., who had been taken hostage, was heavily injured. He was later brought to a hospital where he died on the same day.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-9565

Admin. suprême

7 août 1996

7 août 1996

Objective test: judgment of Caltanisetta Assize Court of Appeal, presided over by S.P, contained numerous references to the applicants and their respective roles in carrying out the attack – judgment of

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-1262

Admin. suprême

20 octobre 2009

20 octobre 2009

Lastly, the Court observed that three of the persons convicted of the attack leading to Mr   Agache’s death had not served the prison sentences imposed on them because the Romanian authorities had

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-238820

Admin. suprême

25 novembre 2024

25 novembre 2024

More specifically:   (a) Were the applicant’s comments a gratuitous personal attack on, or insult to M. (see Mamère v. France , no. 12697/03, § 25, ECHR 2006-XIII;   Lopes Gomes da Silva v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1016JUD002762009

Admin. suprême

16 octobre 2014

16 octobre 2014

    In 1993 the applicant sustained another craniocerebral injury, following which he started to suffer from epileptic attacks.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0713JUD000467720

Admin. suprême

13 juillet 2023

13 juillet 2023

According to reports, those singled out for attacks include: ...former Gaddafi loyalists ...’ ...” 30 .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0710JUD005820714

Admin. suprême

10 juillet 2025

10 juillet 2025

• Attackers’ demonstration of hostility towards applicants due to their perceived sexuality not taken into account in determining punishment • State’s failure to discharge its duty to ensure violent attacks

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0722JUD001565322

Admin. suprême

22 juillet 2025

22 juillet 2025

The response also referred to “several incidents during the 2019 General Election including distributed denial of service attacks against political parties, and suspicious emails received by candidates

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0221JUD002342394

Admin. suprême

21 février 2002

21 février 2002

The public prosecutor took statements from his sister-in-law, several other villagers and the village guards accused of the attack.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0414DEC001606490

Admin. suprême

14 avril 1998

14 avril 1998

The Turkish military forces that carried out the attack consisted of a paratroops battalion, twenty tanks, as well as high-angle guns.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1988:1011DEC001297587

Admin. suprême

11 octobre 1988

11 octobre 1988

  The Court stated that, in view of the fact that L. had had heart attacks in 1979, in November 1985 and two further ones in February 1986, no particular medical knowledge was needed to assume that

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0116DEC003263696

Admin. suprême

16 janvier 2001

16 janvier 2001

He claimed that the article aimed at showing that he was the perpetrator of the letter bomb attacks.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0412DEC005564100

Admin. suprême

12 avril 2001

12 avril 2001

News about successful bomb attacks, suicidal attacks, and attacks upon institutions of the Turkish State add further weight to the exhortation to employ violence.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1218DEC007041211

Admin. suprême

18 décembre 2012

18 décembre 2012

Ahmadis are also subject to attacks by non-state actors from sectors of the majority Sunni Muslim population.

Source officielle