In the Court’s view, however, that does not mean that a positive obligation to prevent any potential violence can be derived from this provision.

The court based its judgment on the applicant's birth certificate, in which his patronymic name was indicated as Alexander, and a number of witness statements, including those of the applicant's mother

-M.) and Peer Alexander (P.). The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows. A.     Background to the case The applicant and Mrs   W.-L.

    Is the distinguishing measure appropriate; can the legitimate aim be met by means of the distinction made? 3.

of:   Isabelle Berro, President,   Elisabeth Steiner,   Khanlar Hajiyev,   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska,   Julia Laffranque,   Paulo Pinto de Albuquerque,   Linos-Alexandre

Such applications can be made to an inquiry officer, an investigator or a judge. 38.

The Secretary of State must intend to deport the person and can only use the power to detain for that purpose; ii.

    The Court reiterates that it can only examine applications directed against the States Parties to the Convention.

Certainly, a company cannot be considered to be a person who has suffered damage caused by pre-trial detention ...

In any event, the period of suspension cannot be more than two years.” D.     Criminal Code 22.

It can find a violation of Article   3, even on the assumption that the information provided by the Government is correct. 48.

As regards the second adjective, it cannot refer just to any form of legal compulsion or obligation.

Assembly of St Petersburg, so it cannot reliably confirm the existence of any religious group before its formation in 1998...” 20.

The waiver can be revoked at any moment. 19.     Article 360 establishes the scope of the examination of the case by an appeal court.

If a summons cannot be served on the person being summoned, it can be served on a family member who lives together with the summoned person.

The actual penalty imposed is relevant to the determination but it cannot diminish the importance of what was initially at stake (ibid., § 120).

as a Chamber composed of:   Elisabeth Steiner, President,   Khanlar Hajiyev,   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska,   Julia Laffranque,   Paulo Pinto de Albuquerque,   Linos-Alexandre

Likewise, it cannot be said that the applicant failed to exhaust domestic remedies in respect of the complaints he had brought before the Court. 40.

On account of her active stance in the proceedings and her efforts to obtain information on the progress of the investigation, in the absence of replies from the authorities, Court cannot conclude that