CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0708DEC000012705
8 juillet 2008
Meanwhile, on 14 January 1999, the Wels Public Prosecutor’s Office filed a bill of indictment charging him with the above-mentioned offences.
Page 4 sur 2011
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-51862
25 septembre 1998
margin-bottom:6pt; text-indent:35.4pt; font-size:10pt } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } Final resolution DH (98) 285 HUMAN RIGHTS APPLICATION No. 27850/95 SOCIÉTÉ DAMERY-VETTER-WEIL
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0906DEC002318994
6 septembre 1995
Schwab, a lawyer practising in Wels.
CJUE
ECLI:EU:C:2002:19
15 janvier 2002
#Petición de decisión prejudicial: Landesgericht Wels - Austria.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:1203DEC001889291
3 décembre 1993
Okresek, Head of International Affairs Division, Constitutional Service, Federal Chancellery, Agent, as well as Mr.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0318DEC003856706
18 mars 2010
Kirschner, a lawyer practising in Wels. The Austrian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ambassador F.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0910DEC001447788
10 septembre 1992
Her appeal with the Wels Regional Court was to no avail.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0418DEC004248498
18 avril 2002
The major part of the charges as well as further charges relating to various other offences concerned one co-accused, Mr H., a former judge at the Wels Regional Court.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0617JUD005703000
17 juin 2003
Violation of Art. 6-1 concerning the length of proceedings;Inadmissible under Art. 6-1 concerning the fairness of proceedings, as well as under Art. 14;Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed;Non-pecuniary
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1208DEC001430803
8 décembre 2005
Weh, a lawyer practising in Bregenz. The Government were represented by their Agent, Ambassador H.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0709DEC007088301
9 juillet 2002
They are represented before the Court by Mr Selendi, a lawyer practising in Wels.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0612JUD004248498
12 juin 2003
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1987:1209DEC001210086
9 décembre 1987
On 31 May 1977 the Wels Public Prosecutor's Office applied to the investigating judge (Untersuchungsrichter) at the Wels District Court (Kreisgericht
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-11205
20 septembre 2016
The Court further observed the subsequent lack of a prosecuting party in the appeal proceedings as well and concluded that the appeal proceedings had not remedied the impartiality matter arising at trial
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0527DEC003128910
27 mai 2014
Weh, a lawyer practising in Bregenz. The Austrian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr H.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1122DEC003263796
22 novembre 2001
In March 1988 the court file arrived at the Wels Regional Court.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0612DEC001136003
Berger, greffier de section , Vu la requête susmentionnée introduite le 11 mars 2003, Après en avoir délibéré, rend la décision suivante : EN FAIT Les requérants, Wolfgang Werlé et Manfred Mauber
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0401DEC005043909
1 avril 2014
Weh, a lawyer practising in Bregenz. The Austrian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ambassador H.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0329DEC004459112
29 mars 2016
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1021DEC000665209
21 octobre 2014
Hofer, a lawyer practising in Wels. The Austrian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr H.