DE PRUD'HOMMES DE MONTPELLIER No RG06 / 00789 APPELANTS : Monsieur Yannick X... ... ... 34070 MONTPELLIER Représentant : Me Alain CHEVILLARD (avocat au barreau de MONTPELLIER) Monsieur Thierry

GENERALI IARD [Adresse 3] [Localité 4] ayant pour avocat postulant Me Eric DABIN de la SELARL ERIC DABIN, avocat au barreau de DEUX-SEVRES et pour avocat plaidant Me Clément HURSTEL, avocat au barreau

Thierry D..., demeurant ..., 11 / de M. Gérard E..., demeurant ..., 12 / de YCN...

A..., ainsi que l'ensemble des copies de documents papier et/ou informatiques et toutes copies desdits fichiers effectués le cas échéant ultérieurement par ses soins ; - interdire à la SCP Frison-Daubin

Date naissance 1] 1989 à [Localité 11] (18) Madame [J] [S] épouse [U] [T] née le [Date naissance 6] 1957 à [Localité 11] demeurant ensemble au [Adresse 5] ayant pour avocat postulant Me Eric DABIN

de la SELARL ERIC DABIN, avocat au barreau de DEUX-SEVRES et pour avocat plaidant Me Marie-Eléonore AFONSO, avocat au barreau de PARIS INTIMEES : S.A.M.C.V.

They argued that the applicant’s complaints were only linked to Erkut Direkçi and that the applicant himself had not been directly affected by the impugned proceedings.

The concept of victim must, in theory, be interpreted autonomously.

travaux d'installation des équipements thermiques et la partie n°2, revenant à la société Dalkia, relative à l'exploitation et la maintenance de la chaufferie existante et des sous-stations.

On 25 June 2008 they filed a reply to the appeal lodged by the defendants.

  11–12, §   27, and Dalia v. France , judgment of 19 February 1998, Reports 1998-I, pp. 87-88, §   38). 41.

They became legal again when the younger partner reached the age of 18.

The complaints of the third, fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh, eighth, and ninth applicants The Court notes that, after lodging their original complaints, the third, fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh, eighth,

In the alternative, they argued that the applicant had not exhausted domestic remedies.

They submitted that the judgment in question had been enforced.

Thierry J..., domicilié [...], 14°/ M. Mohammed K..., domicilié [...], 15°/ M. Frédéric L..., domicilié [...] , 16°/ M. Thierry M..., domicilié [...], 17°/ M.

They submitted that the judgments in question had been enforced.

They became legal again when the younger partner reached the age of eighteen.

They also petitioned the LDC to issue a certificate ( ордер ) for the applicant’s use of those studios.