The Prosecutor General directed that book-entry shares were to be considered as items within the meaning of criminal law and could therefore be seized on the basis of Articles 78 and 79 of

On 15 October 2012 the bank’s general meeting of shareholders adopted a resolution whereby it decided to perform a consolidation of the bank’s shares.

, Description: Shops, Use: Rented out, Share: Whole 4.     Famagusta, Registration no. ? , Description: Building Site, Use: Vacant, Share: Whole 5.

    Justice G.B informed that she had owned shares in the other two major Icelandic banks, Kaupþing Bank (hereinafter “Kaupþing”) and Landsbanki Íslands (hereinafter “Landsbanki”), which had

        One set of charges concerned alleged forgeries committed in view of an increase of shares at the shareholders' meeting on 18 November 1980.

BES undertook to buy back the shares on 24 August 2014, together with EUR 20,202 in interest.

It called and conducted two general meetings of MTFU’s shareholders to which the applicants were denied access and which were attended by only 8% of MTFU’s share capital.

In December 1996, August 1997 and October 1997 Sovtransavto-Lugansk’s managing director increased the company’s share capital, each time by one third.

shares to each of the second and third applicants.

for [company A.] to   assume that it had legitimately become the owner of the shares, which had provided a basis for it to have the power to call the general meeting”. 23.

Noting that only 6.37% of the shares were duly represented, the polling commission decided to adjourn the general meeting for another date.

With those parts, the applicant company obtained shares in C. by buying them at public auctions or by exchanging them for other shares from two similar trusts.

to the ConEC meeting dealing with their registration requests.

All signatures in the signature sheets shall be examined. ... 59.6.

The applicant owned four shares in a company, the MotoMeter AG. 99   % of this company’s shares were held by the company Robert Bosch GmbH.

At the time of the events he owned 50% of the company’s shares. The other half of the shares was owned by A.N. 7.

In his action he criticised the decision to increase the company’s share capital, certain shortcomings and irregularities in the recovery plan adopted by the meeting of creditors and the competence of

    Article 79c provides for the seizure of book-entry shares.

In particular, the SJC concluded that, following the purchase of 100% shares of a limited liability company and prior to state registration of his ownership, the applicant had been engaged in carrying