THE LAW On 2 August 2013 the Court received the following declaration signed by the applicant: “I, Sebastian Dariusz Kaczmarek, note that the Government of Poland are prepared to pay me, with a  

Sebastian Mech, with a view to securing a friendly settlement of the above-mentioned case pending before the European Court of Human Rights, PLN   30,000 (thirty thousand Polish zlotys), to cover

THE LAW On 16 April 2013 the Court received the following declaration signed by the applicant: “I, Sebastian Szczeblewski, note that the Government of Poland are prepared to pay me, with a view to securing

THE LAW On 29 March 2018 the Court received the following declaration from the Government: “I, Justyna Chrzanowska, Agent of the Government, declare that the Government of Poland offer to pay to Mr Sebastian

THE LAW On 30   October 2012 the Court received the following declaration signed by the applicant: “I, Sebastian Budziszewski, note that the Government of Poland are prepared to pay me, with a  

conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application.

For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases. Done in English and notified in writing on 24 October 2024.

deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The applicant, Mr Sebastian Mihai Ciocan, was born in 1978.

    The applicant, Mr Ion Sebastian Bădiță, is a Romanian national, who was born in 1977 and lives in Râmnicu-Vâlcea. 2.

The observations were forwarded to the applicant, who was invited to submit his own observations. No reply was received to the Registry’s letter.

    The applicants’ complaint under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention concerning an alleged breach of their right of access to a court was communicated to the Government, who were represented by

De Gaetano, judges, and Lawrence Early, Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 5 January 2005, Having deliberated, decides as follows: PROCEDURE The applicant, Mr Sebastian

[the applicant] ..., Judge F. of the Malatia-Sebastia District Court of Yerevan decides to set criminal case no.

It had regard to the police records and to the guardian’s file.

ITURBE against Spain and A.I.I. and Others against Spain lodged on 19 December 2016 and 19 January 2017 respectively SUBJECT MATTER OF the CASE The applications concern the domestic authorities’ refusal to

The observations were forwarded to the applicant, who was invited to submit its own observations. No reply was received to the Registry’s letter.

The Court received friendly-settlement declarations under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Romania in respect of the facts giving rise to these applications, subject to an

table, Having regard to the declaration submitted by the respondent Government requesting the Court to strike the application out of the list of cases, and the applicant’s reply to this declaration, Having

The Court received friendly-settlement declarations under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Romania in respect of the facts giving rise to these applications, subject to an

THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision.