Le 24 mars 2010, la vice-présidente de la première section a décidé de communiquer la requête au Gouvernement.

    On 19   March 2003 the District Court took a decision reproducing in essence that of 24   October 2002.

By a judgment of 25   March 2009 that District Court judge examined the applicant’s request.

    On 14 March 2013 the Constitutional Court dismissed both of her constitutional complaints as unfounded. It served its decision on the applicant’s representative on 27 March 2013. 31.

    On 31 March 2011 the Court of Appeal delivered its judgment.

  22893/05, §   73, 27   May 2008), and Alexandru Marius Radu v.   Romania (no.

    L’audience fut fixée au 9 mars 2006, à la demande de la banque. 17.

    On 19 March 2004 the same District Court judge confirmed his own decision of 28 January 2004.

    On 18 March 2011 the application was communicated to the Government. It was also decided to rule on the admissibility and merits of the application at the same time (Article 29 § 1).

    The final domestic decision in the present case was given on 10   March 2010.

  2 of 22   March 2010 on medical care in detention facilities).

, together with the Dolj County Court’s decision of 13 March 2000.

    The first hearing before the Šibenik Municipal Court was scheduled for 16 March 2006. 8.

    On 17 March 2008 the applicant met investigator G. and was given a summons for an interview on 24 March 2008.   On that date the applicant was admitted to town hospital no.

  24014/07, § 27, 5   March 2019) and failure to do so will lead the Court to find that the Government are estopped from raising the objection (ibid.). 28.

    A further hearing was held on 28 March 2006. The anonymous witnesses and several other witnesses did not appear.

  Serbia (preliminary objection) [GC], nos. 17153/11 and 29 others, §   53, 25   March 2014). 49.

    Federal Law no. 38-FZ of 30 March 1995 30.

    Le Gouvernement, se prévaut, en outre, de l’arrêt Housein c.