AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0918DEC001629808
18 septembre 2012
18 septembre 2012
He was represented before the Court by Mr B. Yavuz, a lawyer practising in Ankara. The Turkish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0320DEC000176908
20 mars 2012
20 mars 2012
He was represented before the Court by Ms Z. Aşçıoğlu, a lawyer practising in Ankara. The Turkish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0214DEC000261305
14 février 2012
14 février 2012
He is represented before the Court by Mr İ. Kartal and Mr F. Polat, lawyers practising in Van. The Turkish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0214DEC004329908
14 février 2012
14 février 2012
The Turkish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0918DEC004857110
18 septembre 2012
18 septembre 2012
The Turkish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent. The application mainly concerns the excessive length of the criminal proceedings against the applicant.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0510DEC002724109
10 mai 2012
10 mai 2012
He is represented before the Court by Mr Ü. Parlak, a lawyer practising in Hatay. The Turkish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0510DEC002670809
10 mai 2012
10 mai 2012
He is represented before the Court by Mr Ü. Parlak, a lawyer practising in Hatay. The Turkish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0918DEC005226607
18 septembre 2012
18 septembre 2012
The Turkish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0331DEC000436404
31 mars 2009
31 mars 2009
the facts giving rise to this application against an undertaking by the Government to pay him 3,500 euros (EUR).
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0214DEC000907609
14 février 2012
14 février 2012
The applicants in cases nos. 9076/09 and 9088/09 also invoked Article 6 of the Convention in this respect.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1020DEC000459206
20 octobre 2009
20 octobre 2009
On the 10 June 2009 Court decided to communicate the applicants’ complaint concerning the lengthy non-enforcement of final judgment given in their favour.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0223DEC005170907
23 février 2010
23 février 2010
The last decision in this respect, rendered by the Skopje Court of Appeal on 17 May 2007, was served on the applicant on 29 May 2007.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0401DEC000058404
1 avril 2008
1 avril 2008
The applicants did not wish to use this remedy maintaining that they had turned to the Ministry of Justice on 15 February 2006 claiming the compensation in respect of their expenses but, on 30 August 2006
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0125DEC001199306
25 janvier 2011
25 janvier 2011
The Macedonian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, R. Lazareska Gerovska.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0605DEC001897909
5 juin 2012
5 juin 2012
She was represented before the Court by Mr M. Erbil, a lawyer practising in İstanbul. The Turkish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0522DEC000370409
22 mai 2012
22 mai 2012
The Turkish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1013DEC000643907
13 octobre 2009
13 octobre 2009
In its view, this amount would constitute adequate redress and sufficient compensation for the impugned length of the said proceedings, and thus a reasonable sum as to quantum in the present case in the
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0404JUD003543005
4 avril 2013
4 avril 2013
In their estimate this was the current market price of a flat at Znamenka equal to the expropriated one. They arrived at that amount by consulting estate agents’ offers on the Internet. 12.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0904DEC006015110
4 septembre 2012
4 septembre 2012
The court held that although the military doctors at the regiment infirmary and Elazığ Military Hospital had clearly failed in their diagnosis and delayed the applicant’s access to treatment, this shortcoming
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1104DEC001812705
4 novembre 2008
4 novembre 2008
All the applicants are Ukrainian nationals. The Ukrainian Government (“the Government”) are represented by their Agent, Mr Y. Zaytsev.
Source officiellePage 4 sur 127