, the consequences of which the suspect, accused or defendant at trial shall be warned of at the time of obtaining his or her signature.”

    According to Article 238 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, a person shall be summoned at his or her home address.

Austria , 12   December 1991, § 70, Series A no. 224; Letellier v. France , 26   June 1991, § 51, Series   A no. 207; and I.A. v.

Belgium judgment of 29 February 1988, Series A no. 129, p. 24, para. 61; and the Letellier v. France judgment of 26 June 1991, Series A no. 207, p. 22, para. 56).

civile N° RG 24/00146 - N° Portalis DBWR-W-B7I-PMZE Grosse délivrée à la SELARL BENSA & TROIN AVOCATS ASSOCIES , Me Emmanuel BRANCALEONI , la SELARL CHALUS PENOCHET OLIVIA , Me Hervé

Austria , 12   December 1991, § 70, Series A no. 224; Letellier v. France , 26   June 1991, § 51, Series A no. 207; and I.A. v.

The Advocate-General concluded that, in her opinion, the decision of the Court of Appeal had not been taken speedily within the meaning of Article 5 § 4 of the Convention. 18.

Having raped the victim, he killed her by inflicting several blows, kicks and knife lesions to the head, neck and body.

2,50ha, 579 pieds plantés en 1999 sur 1,50ha, 570 pieds plantés en 1996 sur 1ha, l'état phytosanitaire de l'ensemble étant bon, et que la partie de 0,50ha supportait 164 arbres fruitiers (mangues et letchis

It must also take into account the gravity of the charge, information on the accused’s character, his or her profession, age, state of health, family status and other circumstances (Article 99).

age and state of health; (4) his or her sex; (5) his or her occupation; (6)   his or her family status and dependants, if any; (7) his or her   property situation; (8) whether the suspect has

Article 37 (2) provides that the accused person can appoint a lawyer of his or her own choice to represent him or her instead of the lawyer who was appointed ex officio .

that her father had raped her on several occasions.

     Here again, the Court notes that this objection was not raised before the Commission.   It must therefore be dismissed as there is estoppel.   III.

Everyone has the right, while his or her case is before the court, to petition for any relevant law, other legislation, or procedure to be declared unconstitutional.

The applicant's wife likewise remained in detention on remand on the basis of court decisions taken parallel to those relating to her husband.

PROTECTION DE [Localité 9] N° RG 24/00018 APPELANT : Monsieur [R] [H] [C] [J] né le 04 Janvier 1973 à [Localité 7] [Adresse 3] [Localité 1] Représenté par Me ADDE SOUBRA substituant Me Quentin LETESSIER

In bed, during which he sexually interferes with her. Struggle ensues during which she dies".

the existence and persistence of serious indications of guilt, in the present case it nevertheless, alone, cannot justify a length of preventive detention of well over eight and a half years (see Letellier