CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-83675
31 octobre 2007
According to information available to the Secretariat, the photographs at issue in the European Court's judgment have not been reprinted by the German press. II.
Page 4 sur 630
ECLI:CEDH:001-55806
22 mars 1996
Karlheinz Schmidt case delivered on 18 July 1994 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers; Recalling that the case originated in an application (No. 13580/88) against Germany
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1212DEC005902100
12 décembre 2002
The German Government added that Germany was a party to enforcement proceedings and was therefore on an equal footing with the applicants.
ECLI:CEDH:001-56263
22 juillet 2003
and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become final under Articles 44 and 46 of the Convention; Recalling that the case originated in an application (No. 45448/99) against Germany
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0216JUD002933406
16 février 2010
On 16 October 1991 the Governments of the Federal Republic of Germany and the Republic of Poland concluded an agreement on the basis of which the German Government declared that, prompted
comm
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2021:CO00697
13 octobre 2021
acte distinct du même jour, du matériel génétique dénommé « germplasm », ce terme désignant, notamment, les graines, plants, plantes, pollen, microspores, embryons, spécimens, cultures, cellules germinales
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0606DEC004252798
6 juin 2000
The Federal Republic of Germany shall in the future raise no objections against the measures which have been, or will be, carried out with regard to German external assets or other property, seized for
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-13145
16 février 2021
Thirdly, the German prosecution authorities had also been obliged under domestic law, related to Germany’s ratification of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, to investigate any liability
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0712JUD004252798
12 juillet 2001
After the German capitulation of 8 May 1945, the Four Powers had assumed supreme authority in Germany, as stated in the Allied Declaration of 5 June 1945 (Declaration regarding the defeat of Germany and
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0624DEC002974496
24 juin 1996
The German Unification Treaty of 31 August 1990 The Treaty between the Federal Republic of Germany and the former German Democratic Republic on the German Unification
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0624DEC002974296
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0624DEC002979396
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0624DEC002979196
ECLI:CEDH:001-83671
Appendix to Resolution CM/ResDH(2007)122 Information about the measures to comply with the judgment in the case of Gisela Müller against Germany Introductory case summary
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1007DEC004755006
7 octobre 2008
In June 1957 he left the former German Democratic Republic and moved to the Federal Republic of Germany.
ECLI:CEDH:002-11466
Germany [GC] - 42527/98 Judgment 12.7.2001 [GC] Article 6 Civil proceedings Article 6-1 Access to court Exclusion of jurisdiction of German courts with regard to claim for return of property confiscated
ECLI:CEDH:002-10096
26 septembre 1995
German Communist Party: violation [This summary is extracted from the Court’s official reports (Series A or Reports of Judgments and Decisions).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0227DEC003045496
27 février 1997
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2339971-2505683
15 avril 2008
The first judgment concerning Germany dated back to 1968.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0106DEC001552108
6 janvier 2015
This conclusion was not altered by the fact that the applicant was a German national living in Germany who, had he been employed, would have worked in Germany.