On 15 March 2024 the Court received a copy of an agreement, signed by the parties on the same day, with the following stipulations: “1.

On an unspecified date in November 1990 the Warsaw District Prosecutor instituted an investigation against the applicant on suspicion of theft and uttering threats with a view to forcing a third person

A, - et les observations de Me Fozing, représentant M. C. Considérant ce qui suit : 1. M.

He also submitted a medical report from a private clinic, which he had obtained following his release. 14.

#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Taxation — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 11 — National legislation restricting the possibility of forming a group of persons which can be regarded as

cards or visas and the forging of civil status acts.

On 19 September 2008 a prosecutor refused to institute criminal proceedings following the applicant’s complaints.

Following its assessment of the circumstances of the case, however, the Federal Supreme Court did not find that there were sufficient grounds to call into question the balancing exercise already performed

The European Court noted that the applicants had been required to reimburse sums which were the proceeds of their work, obtained in accordance with statute law and forming part of their property.

On the following day E.   grew violent and assaulted her in the kitchen. He hit her on the head and body with his fists, the handle of a knife and a ladle.

Following the beatings, he also suffered from chronic headaches and heart cramps.

filed a new crime report alleging, that during his interrogation of 26 November 2013, A.H. had, inter alia , administered blows to his head and face with a belt, causing the injury to his forehead and forcing

xa0;      against Austria           The European Commission of Human Rights (Second Chamber) sitting in private on 1 September 1993, the following

Poláčková,   Erik Wennerström,   Raffaele Sabato,   Ioannis Ktistakis , judges , and Renata Degener, Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 7 February 2023, Delivers the following

On 8 July 1999 the applicant was charged in the Beli Manastir Municipal Court ( Općinski sud u Belom Manastiru) with forging the vehicle inspection record.

Following an application lodged by the defendant, the district judge struck out the particulars of injury on the ground that the order of October 1997 had not been complied with.

In this respect, the applicant alleges that the domestic courts simply disregarded and did not assess the following points in their judgments: (i) witness R.S. – whose evidence was at the centre of the

Russia - 26601/02 Judgment 3.7.2008 [Section I] Article 3 of Protocol No. 7 Compensation Inability to seek compensation for non-pecuniary damage following quashing of criminal convictions in the absence