:137.43pt; display:inline-block } .sAFF36EC2 { width:18.78pt; display:inline-block } .s1B61D60 { width:156.43pt; display:inline-block }     FIFTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 39017/12 Daniela

146.77pt; display:inline-block } .sF7DC134C { width:39.46pt; display:inline-block } .s44B8752F { width:177.11pt; display:inline-block }     FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 75201/16 Daniela

  1 have been rejected for non-exhaustion of domestic remedies, in so far as the new remedies provided by the Law no. 165/2013 cannot a priori be presumed ineffective (see paragraph 9 above), the

    The Court considers that the serious interference with the applicants’ right to the peaceful enjoyment of their possessions cannot be adequately compensated for by the simple finding of a

Whilst   the Court cannot speculate as to the outcome of the proceedings had the situation been different, it does not find it unreasonable to regard the applicants as having suffered a loss of real

In the course of the investigation, various items were seized: business and accounting documents relating to the applicant’s undertaking, three video cassettes containing recordings of business meetings

    The Court considers that the serious interference with the applicants’ right to the peaceful enjoyment of their possessions cannot be adequately compensated for by the simple finding of a

squad, which was on a mission to execute a European arrest warrant, [and those preliminary investigations being] corroborated by data resulting from the on-site search of the event ( coroborate cu datele