CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

4 294 résultats pour « Atiback »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-9521

Admin. suprême

27 mai 2014

27 mai 2014

: inadmissible Facts – Following a series of bomb attacks in Arnhem (Netherlands) in 1995 and 1996, a magazine published by the applicant foundation issued a press release in which it announced that the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-13708

Admin. suprême

23 juin 2022

23 juin 2022

His remarks had been made about a year after the Paris attacks of January 2015 and less than four months after the attacks perpetrated in Paris and Seine-Saint-Denis in November 2015.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-205789

Admin. suprême

5 octobre 2020

5 octobre 2020

The court of appeal noted that the investigation into the attack on the applicant had been thorough.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0531JUD004011602

Admin. suprême

31 mai 2007

31 mai 2007

D. as one of the possible attackers.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-189908

Admin. suprême

16 janvier 2019

16 janvier 2019

    For his part, Mr I.I. categorically denied being the attacker, and said that he had been in his dormitory at the time of the attack on the applicant.

Source officielle
TA

8e Section - MESD

DTA_2430123_20241126

Administratif

26 novembre 2024

26 novembre 2024

Matalon ; - Les observations orales de Me Atiback, avocate commise d'office représentant M.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0304DEC007199801

Admin. suprême

4 mars 2008

4 mars 2008

R.D. told them the details of the attack on the applicant. 21.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0518DEC005864300

Admin. suprême

18 mai 2006

18 mai 2006

She stated that she was aware of the attack on the applicant, but had no information about the exact circumstances of the attack or of the applicant’s whereabouts. e) Examinations of the site On 14 April

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-244740

Admin. suprême

8 août 2025

8 août 2025

The police and the local authorities were aware of the attack but failed to intervene. The applicants did not return to live in Loshchynivka fearing for their safety.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-204301

Admin. suprême

6 juillet 2020

6 juillet 2020

Alleging that the attack had been motivated by hatred against LGBTI people the applicants sought a criminal case to be opened by the police.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-110641

Admin. suprême

16 mars 2012

16 mars 2012

On the same day I. was brought to the location of the attack and confirmed his earlier statement. He provided more specific details concerning the attack and the participation of various actors.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0615DEC004011602

Admin. suprême

15 juin 2006

15 juin 2006

description of the attackers.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0612JUD001362403

Admin. suprême

12 juin 2012

12 juin 2012

    Attack at Roma settlement (a)   The attack 11.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-193663

Admin. suprême

17 mai 2019

17 mai 2019

    The arson attack on the club and the ensuing investigation At around 5 a.m. on 8 May 2012 an arson attack was made on the club.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-145908

Admin. suprême

30 juin 2014

30 juin 2014

Soon afterwards one of the attackers grabbed the applicant by the t-shirt and thrown her to the floor causing her to hit the ground with her head.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-173349

Admin. suprême

5 avril 2017

5 avril 2017

The applicant’s friend recognised with 100 percent certainty M.M. as one of the attackers.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1127JUD003245704

Admin. suprême

27 novembre 2007

27 novembre 2007

and McCartney and the attack on the Rock Bar. 45.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-249599

Admin. suprême

12 mars 2026

12 mars 2026

In particular, were the alleged physical and verbal attacks on the applicant, as well as the alleged racial motive for them, effectively investigated?

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0306DEC003245704

Admin. suprême

6 mars 2007

6 mars 2007

and McCartney and the attack on the Rock Bar.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-2673

Admin. suprême

29 mai 2007

29 mai 2007

.) - 26870/04 Decision 29.5.2007 [Section V] Article 10 Article 10-1 Freedom of expression Dismissal of municipal employee for issuing a press release that appeared to vindicate the attacks on the World

Source officielle

Page 4 sur 215

← PrécédentSuivant →