CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1986:0509DEC001173385
9 mai 1986
This complaint, accordingly, is also manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 27 para. 2 (art. 27-2) of the Convention. 4.
Page 39 sur 238
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0919DEC002985196
19 septembre 2000
At this meeting he made a speech in Kurdish language on the Kurdish question. This speech was translated to Turkish from Kurdish.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0725JUD001108206
25 juillet 2013
The acquisition of Apatit shares gave rise to litigation in which the State Property Fund opposed Yukos.
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-96912
3 décembre 2009
she had acquired in her own right during her marriage.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-4854
10 juin 2003
In 1994, the company’s annual general meeting decided that a bond loan with warrants be issued. All of the applicants subscribed for bonds under the subscription programme in April of that year.
ECLI:CEDH:001-84560
19 décembre 2007
that in the case Loyen, following contacts between the government and the applicants in order to make the payment, the sum allocated jointly has been paid to the first applicant, with obligation to share
ECLI:CEDH:002-13594
8 mars 2022
had been ordered to leave the country, with which order she had failed to comply.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0421JUD001861613
21 avril 2015
Renovated cells were “put in use” on 1 May 2012 and new mattresses, pillows and sheets were distributed on the same date.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1026JUD001840491
26 octobre 2010
They accordingly requested revision of the principal judgment within the meaning of Rule 80 of the Rules of Court. 10.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0510JUD001443705
10 mai 2007
Moreover, the prosecutor in charge of his case supported his request for confidential meetings. 23.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-162872
20 avril 2016
He held 3,800 shares of Azintrans (4.64% of the total shares); at the material time each share having a value of 10,000 old Azerbaijani manats.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0213JUD005450800
13 février 2007
It stressed that in each round of appeals the facts were the same, i.e. the legal effects of the shore protection programme on its right to build on the land.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1221JUD003469005
21 décembre 2010
s title to the shares was legitimate.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0104DEC004715008
4 janvier 2012
The first three applicants each own an 8/60 share of the house, and the other two applicants are each owners of an 18/60 share of the house. 15.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1126DEC003701107
26 novembre 2013
Duran, a lawyer practising in Mersin. The Turkish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent. A. The circumstances of the case 2.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:1216DEC002513094
16 décembre 1999
Approximately 30 emissions of shares took place from 1981 to 1987.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1207JUD000684102
7 décembre 2006
The applicant did not institute proceedings against A.N. of which she informed the court on 15 November 1994.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0119DEC001249006
19 janvier 2010
She does not, however, specify the circumstances in which she learned about them. B.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0429JUD000904305
29 avril 2014
On the same day both applicants transferred their shares free of charge, representing an overall total of 15.55% of the factory’s share capital, to the State. 24.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:1129JUD001284987
29 novembre 1991
On 10 June 1981 she brought an action to claim a share in the estates before the Brussels Court of First Instance.