CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

4 744 résultats pour « Sher MESSINGER »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1986:0509DEC001173385

Admin. suprême

9 mai 1986

9 mai 1986

  This complaint, accordingly, is also manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 27 para. 2 (art. 27-2) of the Convention.   4.

Page 39 sur 238

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0919DEC002985196

Admin. suprême

19 septembre 2000

19 septembre 2000

At this meeting he made a speech in Kurdish language on the Kurdish question. This speech was translated to Turkish from Kurdish.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0725JUD001108206

Admin. suprême

25 juillet 2013

25 juillet 2013

The acquisition of Apatit shares gave rise to litigation in which the State Property Fund opposed Yukos.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-96912

Admin. suprême

3 décembre 2009

3 décembre 2009

she had acquired in her own right during her marriage.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-4854

Admin. suprême

10 juin 2003

10 juin 2003

In 1994, the company’s annual general meeting decided that a bond loan with warrants be issued. All of the applicants subscribed for bonds under the subscription programme in April of that year.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-84560

Admin. suprême

19 décembre 2007

19 décembre 2007

that in the case Loyen, following contacts between the government and the applicants in order to make the payment, the sum allocated jointly has been paid to the first applicant, with obligation to share

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-13594

Admin. suprême

8 mars 2022

8 mars 2022

had been ordered to leave the country, with which order she had failed to comply.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0421JUD001861613

Admin. suprême

21 avril 2015

21 avril 2015

    Renovated cells were “put in use” on 1 May 2012 and new mattresses, pillows and sheets were distributed on the same date.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1026JUD001840491

Admin. suprême

26 octobre 2010

26 octobre 2010

They accordingly requested revision of the principal judgment within the meaning of Rule 80 of the Rules of Court. 10.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0510JUD001443705

Admin. suprême

10 mai 2007

10 mai 2007

Moreover, the prosecutor in charge of his case supported his request for confidential meetings. 23.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-162872

Admin. suprême

20 avril 2016

20 avril 2016

He held 3,800 shares of Azintrans (4.64% of the total shares); at the material time each share having a value of 10,000 old Azerbaijani manats.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0213JUD005450800

Admin. suprême

13 février 2007

13 février 2007

It stressed that in each round of appeals the facts were the same, i.e. the legal effects of the shore protection programme on its right to build on the land.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1221JUD003469005

Admin. suprême

21 décembre 2010

21 décembre 2010

s title to the shares was legitimate.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0104DEC004715008

Admin. suprême

4 janvier 2012

4 janvier 2012

The first three applicants each own an 8/60 share of the house, and the other two applicants are each owners of an 18/60 share of the house. 15.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1126DEC003701107

Admin. suprême

26 novembre 2013

26 novembre 2013

Duran, a lawyer practising in Mersin. The Turkish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent. A.     The circumstances of the case 2.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:1216DEC002513094

Admin. suprême

16 décembre 1999

16 décembre 1999

  Approximately 30 emissions of shares took place from 1981 to 1987.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1207JUD000684102

Admin. suprême

7 décembre 2006

7 décembre 2006

The applicant did not institute proceedings against A.N. of which she informed the court on 15 November 1994.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0119DEC001249006

Admin. suprême

19 janvier 2010

19 janvier 2010

She does not, however, specify the circumstances in which she learned about them. B.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0429JUD000904305

Admin. suprême

29 avril 2014

29 avril 2014

    On the same day both applicants transferred their shares free of charge, representing an overall total of 15.55% of the factory’s share capital, to the State. 24.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:1129JUD001284987

Admin. suprême

29 novembre 1991

29 novembre 1991

On 10 June 1981 she brought an action to claim a share in the estates before the Brussels Court of First Instance.

Source officielle