One officer punched her in the face and pushed her in the chest demanding that she sit still and make no phone calls.

Le procès-verbal de constat du 23 février 2026 mentionne que des infiltrations d'eaux usées affectent les garages de l'immeuble, le commissaire de justice constatant une forte odeur et des effluves putrides

They opined that the case was being pushed by an NGO to succeed in obtaining a declaration from the Court that the facts constituted a repetitive case and asked the Court to strike the application out

avocat au barreau d'AIX-EN-PROVENCE INTIME Monsieur [T] [J] né le [Date naissance 3] 1971 à CANNES (06), demeurant [Adresse 9] représenté par Me Rémi JEANNIN de la SELARL JEANNIN PETIT PUCHOL

Société ABEILLE IARD ET SANTE (anciennement dénommée SA AVIVA ASSURANCES),sis[Adresse 2] représentée par Me Dominique PETIT SCHMITTER de la SCP BERNARD HUGUES JEANNIN PETIT SCHMITTER PUCHOL

Adresse 5] [Adresse 5] Représenté par Me Jean Paul Chabannes de la Selarl Chabannes-Reche-Banuls, postulant, avocat au barreau de Nîmes Représenté par Me Rémi Jeannin de la Selarl Jeannin Petit Puchol

[Localité 63] Représentant : Me Jean-michel DIVISIA de la SCP COULOMB DIVISIA CHIARINI, avocat au barreau de NIMES - Représentant : Me Dominique PETIT-SCHMITTER de la SELARL SELARL JEANNIN PETIT PUCHOL

MUTUELLES représentée par son représentant légal en exercice domicilié au siège [Adresse 1] représentée et plaidant par Me Laurent HUGUES, avocat au barreau d'AIX-EN-PROVENCE, substitué par Me Géraldine PUCHOL

Then they pushed him on the ground and dragged him by his left hand to the police bus. The incident was filmed on video.

At 3.30 p.m. on the same day Mrs G., the applicant’s other neighbour, witnessed how inspector B. dragged Mr Romanov out of his car and pushed him into a police van.

Roumanie (révision), n o 27153/07, § 10, 13   novembre 2018, et, mutatis mutandis , Manushaqe Puto et autres c.   Albanie (révision), n os   604/07 et 3 autres, § 9, 4 novembre 2014).

Court is prepared to accept that this decisive fact “could not reasonably have been expected to be known” to the Government, which became aware of the applicant’s death on 17 October 2023 (see Manushaqe Puto

  Romania (revision), no. 47732/06, §§ 9-11, 22 March 2016 and, mutatis mutandis , Manushaqe Puto and Others v. Albania (revision), nos. 604/07 and 3   others, §   9, 4 November 2014).

These questions will be followed in the framework of the pending execution of the Driza group of cases (33771/02) and of the case of Puto (609/07) respectively.

Court is prepared to accept that this decisive fact “could not reasonably have been expected to be known” to the Government, which became aware of the applicant’s death on 9 November 2023 (see Manushaqe Puto

as the interest of the good administration of justice, requires a continuation of the examination of the case, pursuant to Article 37 § 1 in fine of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis , Manushaqe Puto

prepared to accept that this decisive fact “could not reasonably have been expected to be known” to the Government, which became aware of the applicant’s death on 22   February 2022 (see Manushaqe Puto

Court is prepared to accept that this decisive fact could not reasonably have been expected to be known to the Government, which became aware of the applicants’ death on 28 March 2022 (see Manushaqe Puto

is prepared to accept that this decisive fact “could not reasonably have been expected to be known” to the Government, which became aware of the applicant’s death on 22 February 2022 (see Manushaqe Puto