CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0312DEC007132713
12 mars 2019
that the applicant had been misled by his co-organisers regarding the number of people attending the event (2,883 persons), the first-instance court noted that even the number of guests he had been aware
Page 39 sur 101
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0219JUD000406304
19 février 2009
Making its assessment on an equitable basis, the Court awards the applicant EUR 1,000 under this head. B. Costs and expenses 62.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1021JUD007357110
21 octobre 2014
The introduction of the book called on readers to decide whether they perceived the published documents as pieces of evidence of censorship or as a supervisor’s valid instructions to his colleagues. 37
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0218JUD004391210
18 février 2014
Lastly, he submitted copies of the aforementioned pieces of evidence before the domestic courts. 10.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0121JUD002137703
21 janvier 2014
Accordingly, ruling on an equitable basis, it awards the second applicant 5,000 euros (EUR) in respect of non-pecuniary damage. 61.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0423JUD003636709
23 avril 2015
Threatening us with firearms, they had taken away my brother, Rustam Kagirov ... These men did not introduce themselves and behaved rudely.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0528JUD004329098
28 mai 2002
A commercial skip and a large piece of hoarding were being used by persons in the crowd to shield them from plastic baton rounds as they moved towards the police.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1102JUD005990900
2 novembre 2006
The applicant complained that the persistent noise and harmful emissions from the plant, which was only 30 metres away from her house, entailed severe disturbance to her environment and a
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0402DEC002772510
2 avril 2013
Abdi Awad Ahmed (qui séjournait également au centre de Marina di Massa) était le père de l’enfant qu’elle portait.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0327JUD005676508
27 mars 2012
The applicant was able to identify her sisters by their personal belongings, pieces of hair, remaining facial features and teeth crowns. 11.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0617JUD000008104
17 juin 2008
All of the policemen declared that the applicant had dipped his fingers in a glass of beer in order to wash away traces of phosphorescent dust. 20.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1103JUD000628402
3 novembre 2009
In their view that time-limit had started running on 26 March 1997 when that piece of legislation had taken effect. 56.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1011JUD005786209
11 octobre 2011
The applicant is one of eleven owners of a piece of land in Birkirkara, Malta, having an area of 1,578 square metres (“sq.m.”). 8.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1001JUD003764597
1 octobre 2002
Therefore, the Court does not award the applicant any compensation for pecuniary damage.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1105JUD003744397
5 novembre 2002
Consequently, there is no justification for making any award to him under that head. 53.
Pôle 4 - Chambre 5
6363685437e31b7f744449d8
2 novembre 2022
société ADP INGENIERIE la rupture de leurs pourparlers, refusant son projet de supervision de l'opération de construction de l'aéroport de [Localité 4] ("Notification of intention to nullify letter of award
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0622JUD001840391
22 juin 2010
Finally, the Court considers that an award should be made in respect of the anguish and feelings of helplessness and frustration which the applicant must have experienced over the years in
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0113JUD003698397
13 janvier 2004
Commission of Human Rights (“the Commission”) under former Article 25 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Netherlands national, Mr Pieter
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0113JUD001182507
13 janvier 2009
The applicant, who was not represented by a lawyer, requested the Court to make an award of just satisfaction on the basis of its case ‑ law in similar cases in order to redress the
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0611JUD006434609
11 juin 2015
On 11 May 1994 the Innsbruck Tax Authority first informed the Innsbruck Public Prosecutor of the suspicion of tax fraud by the applicant in connection with the sale of several pieces of artwork