Germany [GC], no.   75529/01, §§ 103-108, ECHR 2006 ‑ VII and Herbst v. Germany , no.   20027/02, §§ 63-68, 11 January 2007).

He was extradited to Germany in 1999 following a request by the German authorities for his temporary surrender.

national who was born in 1941 and lives in Kirchdorf (Germany).

Germany (dec.), no. 37595/97, ECHR 1999-VIII, and Schmelzer v. Germany (dec.), no.   45176, 12   December 2000).

Germany cited above, § 48). 41.

{ margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic }   Communicated on 6 February 2017   FIFTH SECTION Application no. 50053/16 Klaus HARISCH against Germany

font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic }   Communicated on 20 June 2016   FIFTH SECTION Application no. 6091/16 Hans-Wilhelm SAURE against Germany

German reunification was “in the public interest”.

        The applicant, who was born in Germany, spent the first 13 years of his life in Germany.

national, who was born in 1976 and currently lives in Gaggenau, Germany.

The Die Republikaner had not been banned, but the German courts had carefully examined why this was not considered a prerequisite when assessing the applicant’s suitability for the post.

Belkacem also alleged discrimination by reason of the fact that a foreigner not speaking German was in a less favourable position than a German person. 2.

Germany (dec.), no.   3237/06, 12   April   2011 and, most recently, Auerswald v. Germany (dec.), no.   24098/09, 6   September   2011).

    The applicant, Mr Heinz Heinrich Piroth, is a German national, who was born in 1952 and is detained in Wöllstein. He was represented before the Court by Mr U.

GERMANY   The European Court of Human Rights has today delivered at a public hearing its Chamber judgment [1] in the case of Gäfgen v. Germany (application no. 22978/05).

       The applicant, born in 1971, is a German national and resident at Drakenburg.   He is employed in the German civil service.

  Appendix to Resolution CM/ResDH(2011)215   Information about the measures to comply with the judgment in the case of Böhmer against Germany     Introductory case summary   The

From there, via an unknown route, the applicant returned to Germany. 2.

Germany (dec.) , no. 38059/07, 4 May 2010). 34.

    She arrived in Germany on 17 November 1994 and applied for asylum. She submitted that her home had been searched by the authorities in their absence in October 1994.