CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-184558
12 juin 2018
Have the applicants suffered discrimination in the enjoyment of their Convention rights on the ground of their Roma origin contrary to Article 14 of the Convention read in conjunction with
Page 39 sur 1005
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-816
9 septembre 2010
reasons for its choice, it based its decision on the fact that the doctor who attended him regularly had at no point recommended systematic hospital treatment, rather than on the firm opinion to the contrary
ECLI:CEDH:002-1495
11 juin 2009
Law : Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 – It was not the Court’s task to decide whether or not it had been contrary to the Convention to allow political parties to withdraw their candidates on account of their
ECLI:CEDH:001-192029
26 février 2019
COMPLAINTS The applicants complain under Article 5 of the Convention that their detention was arbitrary and therefore contrary to their rights to liberty and security.
ECLI:CEDH:002-12002
1 février 2018
Consequently, at the time of the applicant’s expulsion to Algeria there had been a genuine and serious risk that he would be exposed to treatment contrary to Article 3 of the Convention.
ECLI:CEDH:001-208730
18 février 2021
investigation and trial was requested by the authorities, including her examinations by an investigator (three times) and before a court (twice), even after the experts had issued recommendations to the contrary
ECLI:CEDH:001-242943
2 avril 2025
Subsequently the applicants lodged a constitutional complaint, claiming inter alia that the impugned Regulation was unjustified, contrary to domestic law and resulted in significant financial loss.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0405DEC004008904
5 avril 2007
and bond on the basis that they had been obtained by, inter alia, the exercise of undue influence and/or duress, and/or misrepresentations or fraud, and/or without lawful consideration and/or were contrary
ECLI:CEDH:002-4236
28 septembre 2004
Protocol No. 1 Possessions Question whether claim sufficiently established to constitute an asset: no violation Facts : In 1959 the applicant’s father was convicted of keeping gold and silver coins contrary
ECLI:CEDH:002-10539
21 avril 2015
In their application to the European Court, they complained that denying them the social security benefits that were paid to other patients being treated under the Act was contrary to Article 14
ECLI:CEDH:001-225265
15 mai 2023
Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his private and/or family life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention, owing to the restrictions that applied during the
ECLI:CEDH:001-247384
7 novembre 2025
Contrary to the approach held by the first instance court, the Supreme court considered that the applicant did not hold a dominant position as a brotherhood, taking into account that it did not have the
ECLI:CEDH:001-245594
25 septembre 2025
Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his private life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention (see, among others, Denisov v.
ECLI:CEDH:001-244740
8 août 2025
Has there been a violation of the applicants’ right to respect for their private or family life or their home, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention? 6.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0313DEC004593416
13 mars 2025
January 2021 an effective remedy for individuals who considered that they had been subjected to inadequate conditions of detention, and who were no longer being held in conditions that were allegedly contrary
ECLI:CEDH:001-189920
15 janvier 2019
Did the applicants suffer discrimination in the enjoyment of their Convention rights as a result of the adoption of the judgments nos. 17/1995, 21/1998 and 35/1999, contrary to Article 14
ECLI:CEDH:001-236097
5 septembre 2024
He does not complain about the strip search having been contrary to his religious beliefs in his application to the Court.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0918DEC004729399
18 septembre 2001
Provisions in such laws which are contrary to any provisions of the Constitution shall not, according to Article 188 § 2, continue to be in force.
comm
6137237fcd5801467740a889
30 mai 2000
Conrard, V - Sur le pourvoi n° K 98-30.278 formé par la société Imagin'Action, dont le siège 10, Côte de la Jonchère, 78380 Bougival, représentée par son gérant M.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1990:0907DEC001225986
7 septembre 1990
The applicants also complained that, contrary to Article 6, the judgment was not pronounced publicly. 2.