However, “possessions” within the meaning of that provision can be either “existing possessions” or assets, including claims, in respect of which an applicant can argue that he has at least a “legitimate

BAJRAMOVSKI against the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia   The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 26   June   2018 as a Chamber composed of:   Linos-Alexandre

In consequence, they cannot be considered an effective remedy for the purposes of Article 13 in conjunction with Article   1 of Protocol   No.

The Court cannot accept this argument.

Consequently, as the applicants’ complaint can only be understood in the light of these domestic provisions, their aim was to retrieve the moneys they deposited with the State in 1991-92.

Westerdiek , Section Registrar , Having regard to the above application lodged on 10 August 2004, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS The applicant, Mr Alexander Göbel, is a German national

Italie, La Cour européenne des droits de l’homme (première section), siégeant en une Chambre composée de   :   Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos, président,   Ksenija Turković,   Guido Raimondi

Sometimes, as counsel explained, and for various reasons, there is little or no eyewitness evidence and this can happen, as you can readily understand, especially in the case of sexual offences.

44278/06, lodged on 5 September, 31 August, 18 and 12   September 2006, respectively, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS The applicants are the Bulgarian nationals Mr Dimitar Alexandrov

The Constitution does not set out the conditions under which a person can claim damages. It was left for the lawmaker to regulate those conditions. ...

They provide sufficient evidence of the existence of motives which, above and beyond nationalism, can only be viewed as racial, or ethnic, discrimination.

In this respect the Court observes that hindrance can amount to a violation of the Convention just like a legal impediment. 64.

In this respect the Court observes that hindrance can amount to a violation of the Convention just like a legal impediment. 64.

    Historical background A summary account of historical events in which the present application originated can be found in the Court’s decision on admissibility in the case of Preussische Treuhand

pour avocat plaidant Me Indra BALASSOUPRAMANIANE, Avocat au barreau de TOULOUSE INTIME Monsieur [D] [N] né le 19 Janvier 1952 à [Localité 11], demeurant [Adresse 4] représenté par Me Alexandra

Without a difference in treatment, there can be no claim for discrimination.

    Therefore, the Court cannot accept that the applicant’s complaint to the Court concerned only part of the property in dispute. 11.

Les dispositions de l'article 3 par. 1 de la Constitution garantissent les saints canons et les traditions de l'Eglise orthodoxe.

As a result, they cannot invoke Turkish responsibility.