CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

3 861 résultats pour « Stuart White »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0615JUD001243386

Admin. suprême

15 juin 1992

15 juin 1992

It is a matter for the court assessing the evidence to decide what weight can be attached in a particular case to the written statements of an undercover agent who has not appeared before the court, where

Page 38 sur 194

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-189946

Admin. suprême

15 janvier 2019

15 janvier 2019

On 3 March 2009 the applicants lodged a claim with the District Court against the State and the Mayor of Yerevan seeking compensation for termination of their right of use of accommodation.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0608DEC005326212

Admin. suprême

8 juin 2021

8 juin 2021

In the meantime, the applicant and other persons lodged an action with the Economic Court to start the bankruptcy procedure in respect of company   A.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0201JUD002473715

Admin. suprême

1 février 2022

1 février 2022

    The Government argued that there had been no violation of Article 3 of the Convention since the applicant had given inconsistent and contradictory statements, leading to R.S.’s acquittal.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1228953-1279118

Admin. suprême

20 janvier 2005

20 janvier 2005

  On 4 September 2000 the applicant was given time to study the case-file and his trial was set   to start on 9 October 2000.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1114DEC005585315

Admin. suprême

14 novembre 2024

14 novembre 2024

    The authorities made an attempt to start the construction immediately, but abandoned it, and the expropriation proceedings were discontinued on 3   October 2005. 6.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:1130DEC002284293

Admin. suprême

30 novembre 1994

30 novembre 1994

  However, the Katowice Regional Bar Council appealed to the Supreme Administrative Court against this decision and refused to allow the applicant to start working as a trainee advocate.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0217JUD002576094

Admin. suprême

17 février 2004

17 février 2004

The soldiers could not understand Kurdish, and asked what she had said.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1120JUD004770808

Admin. suprême

20 novembre 2014

20 novembre 2014

    Lieutenant A., first statement 28.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0522JUD006931601

Admin. suprême

22 mai 2008

22 mai 2008

The State had not been named as a defendant and had not been party to the proceedings.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-157807

Admin. suprême

17 septembre 2015

17 septembre 2015

It also ordered Apollo to pay Scott’s costs from the sum of GBP 35,000 which Apollo had to lodge at the start of the appeal.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0907DEC003571897

Admin. suprême

7 septembre 1999

7 septembre 1999

Lord Justice Stuart-Smith explained in this connection:   “We have already referred to the substantial, almost overwhelming evidence of drug supply from what was found in the [applicants’] house.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1001JUD001054417

Admin. suprême

1 octobre 2019

1 octobre 2019

Furthermore, the prosecutor had not taken sufficient measures to clarify what M.K. had been doing during the last few hours before the assault and under what circumstances he had consumed alcohol; the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0316JUD002868006

Admin. suprême

16 mars 2010

16 mars 2010

She states that she raised this possibility with Dr S. who dismissed it without giving any reasons. 13.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0604DEC000784108

Admin. suprême

4 juin 2013

4 juin 2013

In its examination of the complaints the Court starts from the assumption that the said court orders were enforced and the impugned measures implemented (see paragraph 18 above). 33.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1126JUD000369010

Admin. suprême

26 novembre 2015

26 novembre 2015

According to the applicant’s statement in the domestic proceedings, the statements printed in the leaflet had also been included on the webpage. 47.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1113DEC001483211

Admin. suprême

13 novembre 2014

13 novembre 2014

He also provided the Committee with a statement which he intended to make at the start of his oral evidence. The Commissioner attended the hearing. 15.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1031JUD000476218

Admin. suprême

31 octobre 2019

31 octobre 2019

Georghiadis, Senior Advisor to the State Legal Council, and Mrs A. Magrippi, Legal Assistant at the State Legal Council. 3.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1990:0713DEC001670690

Admin. suprême

13 juillet 1990

13 juillet 1990

          According to the applicant's statements subsequently made before the Swiss authorities in 1984, while he resided at Nevsehir in Turkey he first belonged

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0409DEC002734895

Admin. suprême

9 avril 1997

9 avril 1997

him alone and to ask M what were his wishes as regards contact with his father.

Source officielle