The Acting President of the Section granted the applicant’s request for his identity not to be disclosed to the public (Rule 47 § 4 of the Rules of Court).

On 7 March 2013 the Court received the applicant’s request for the application of interim measure under Rule 39 of the Rules of Court.

She lodged an application with the Court by fax on Friday 2   September 2005 and applied for protection under Rule   39 of the Rules of Court, alleging that her deportation would be violate her

39 of the Rules of Court, Having regard to the decision to grant priority to the above application under Rule 41 of the Rules of Court, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS The applicant,

It was decided to grant the applicant ex officio anonymity under Rule 47 § 4 of the Rules of Court. 2.     The Latvian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms. K.

Having regard to the above application lodged on 21 October 2008, Having regard to the interim measure indicated to the respondent Government under Rule 39 of the Rules of Court and the fact that this

  The above provisions are subject to Rule 33 (1) of the Prison Rules.

THE LAW Rule 36 of the Rules of Court reads, in relevant part: “1.

These Rules are supplemented by Standing Orders and Circular Instructions made by the Secretary of State which set out the detailed practice to be followed in applying these Rules.

    On 23 April 1996 the applicant designated the lawyer who would represent it (Rule 31 of Rules of Court B).

These Rules are supplemented by Standing Orders and Circular Instructions made by the Secretary of State which set out the detailed practice to be followed in applying these Rules.

The first applicant was charged with an offence contrary to Rule 47(17) of the Prison Rules 1964 (“the Prison Rules”). 12.

Rule 44 A of the Rules of Court provides that parties have a duty to cooperate with the Court.

44D of the Rules of Court.

    Rule 47 of the Rules of Court – in force from 1 July 2006 until 1   January 2009 – provided in its relevant part: “5.

    The case concerns the applicant’s deportation to Tajikistan despite the interim measure being indicated under Rule 39 of the Rules of Court. 2.

of the 1947 Rules.

It was allocated to the Third Section of the Court (Rule 52 § 1 of the Rules of Court). It was subsequently transferred to the Fourth Section of the Court. 5.

or its Protocols (Article 37 § 1 in fine of the Convention and Rule 62 § 3 of the Rules of Court).

  54 § 3 of the Rules of Court.