64915/01, § 70, ECHR 2004-VI; Pfeifer v. Austria , no. 12556/03, § 35, 15   November 2007; and Polanco Torres and Movilla Polanco v. Spain , no.   34147/06, § 40, 21 September 2010).

Spain , no. 34147/06, § 40, 21 September 2010; Pfeifer v. Austria , no.   12556/03, § 35, 15 November 2007; and the authorities cited therein). This also applies to a person’s honour (see A. v.

life, the Court has also found that a person’s reputation formed part of his or her personal identity and psychological integrity and therefore fell within the scope of his or her private life (see Pfeifer

Romania [GC], no. 33348/96, §91, ECHR 2004 ‑ XI; Pfeifer v. Austria , no. 12556/03, § 35, 15 November 2007; and Polanco Torres and Movilla Polanco v. Spain , no.

France [GC], nos. 21279/02 and 36448/02, ECHR 2007 ‑ IV; Pfeifer v. Austria , no. 12556/03, 15 November 2007; Vitrenko and Others v.

  30943/04, 10 February 2011) and paragraphs 43 ‑ 46 of the Court’s judgment in Pfeifer v. Bulgaria (no. 24733/04, 17 February 2011). 6.

France , no. 64915/01, § 70, ECHR   2004-VI; Pfeifer v. Austria , no. 12556/03, § 35, 15 November 2007; and Polanco Torres and Movilla Polanco v.

  64915/01, §   70, ECHR 2004-VI; Pfeifer v. Austria , no.   12556/03, § 35, 15   November 2007; Polanco Torres and Movilla Polanco v.

Spain , no. 34147/06, §   40, 21   September 2010; and Pfeifer v. Austria , no.   12556/03, § 35, 15 November 2007, and the authorities cited therein).

  33348/96, § 91, ECHR 2004 ‑ XI; Pfeifer v.   Austria , no. 12556/03, § 35, 15 November 2007; and Polanco Torres and   Movilla Polanco v. Spain , no.

legitimate aim of protecting the rights and reputation of others, an aim which is consistent with the protection afforded to the right to reputation under Article 8 of the Convention (see, inter alia , Pfeifer

person is criticised in the context of a public debate, forms part of his or her personal identity and psychological integrity and therefore also falls within the scope of his or her private life (see Pfeifer

Court HR, Pfeifer and Plankl v. Austria judgment of 25 February 1992, Series A no. 227, pp. 16-17, para. 37).

Specifically in respect of the protection of an individual's reputation, the Court notes that it has been acknowledged as an interest guaranteed by Article 8 of the Convention (see, inter alia , Pfeifer

or her reputation is encompassed by Article 8 as part of the right to respect for private life, since a person’s reputation is part of his or her personal identity and psychological integrity (see Pfeifer

Pfieffer,   Advisers ; (b)     for the applicants Mr   B. Emmerson , Ms   J. Simor,   Counsel , Mr   P. Leech, Ms   D.

all events such a waiver must, if it is to be effective for Convention purposes, be established in an unequivocal manner and be attended by minimum safeguards commensurate to its importance (see the Pfeiffer

Romania [GC], no. 33348/96, §91, ECHR   2004 ‑ XI; Pfeifer v. Austria , no. 12556/03, § 35, 15 November 2007; Polanco Torres and Movilla Polanco v. Spain , no.

;�}�˯eW�fw4���s�=׿ҿ�/��(�Y��Ǫ�2Z% ����0�8�PY�1ތ%��x `��ԑ�Xh>��w)�PfxF���o��ɾ� � C�7���P�h��ǚ�g�]���@�4_z��3篮�}��#�p�S���G���i�Nݮ֌e���\kh�#{�7\
�*��z��P�K$#*�I� �H�Pc�BKT��RF��D�t'��6��