69284/16 16/11/2016 Dobrica Mihailović 02/12/1951 Mihailović Vesna Belgrade 11/12/2008   04/07/2013   4 years and 6 months and 24 days 2 levels of jurisdiction   &#

; 21/04/2008   8 months and 2 days 3 levels of jurisdiction   4 years, 5 months and 11 days 3 levels of jurisdiction       48971/13 24/07/2013 Yuriy Volodymyrovych KOVALYOV 31/

Despite several attempts by Termoelectrica to reduce the noise level, it persisted.

(s) of jurisdiction     4 year(s) and 7 month(s) and 7 day(s) 2 level(s) of jurisdiction   Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of civil

COMPOSITION DE LA COUR : L'affaire a été débattue le 03 Octobre 2025, en audience publique, devant la cour composée de : Monsieur Jean-François LEVEQUE, président de chambre M.

procédure inscrite au Greffe sous le N° RG 23/00939 - N° Portalis DBVG-V-B7H-EUT5 dans une instance entre les parties suivantes : Madame [X] [U] [Adresse 2] [Localité 1] Représentant : Me Tulin CIP LEVÊQUE

Date of introduction Applicant’s name Date of birth   Representative’s name and location Start of proceedings End of proceedings Total length Levels of jurisdiction Domestic court file number  

X..., B..., A..., Y... et Z..., Le Quellenec, Boudet, Barbedienne, Depagne, Herpault, Allain, Leveque, Gaultier, Perre, Ruiz, Colin, Yobe et Cabaret : Considérant que MM.

LEVEQUE, Président de chambre Mme DAYRE, Conseiller M. LAETHIER, Vice-président placé qui en ont délibéré.

LEVEQUE, Président de chambre Mme DAYRE, Conseiller M. LAETHIER, Vice-Président placé qui en ont délibéré.

LEVEQUE, Président de chambre Mme GREWEY, Conseiller M. LAETHIER, Vice-Président placé qui en ont délibéré.

, à la demande du Fonds régional d'organisation du marché du poisson (FROM Nord), de la société Dieppoise de consignation et fabrication d'agrès (DCFA) et de la société d'exploitation de l'armement Leveau

    Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of justifying the overall length of the proceedings at the national level.

    Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of justifying the overall length of the proceedings at the national level.

    Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of justifying the overall length of the proceedings at the national level.

    Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of justifying the overall length of the proceedings at the national level.

  6232/20   and   22394/20, §§ 46-59, 1   March 2022), the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of justifying the overall length of the proceedings at the national level

    Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of justifying the overall length of the proceedings at the national level.

    Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of justifying the overall length of the proceedings at the national level.