D A, représentés par la Selarlu Guil avocat, demandent au juge des référés : 1°) de les admettre au bénéfice de l'aide juridictionnelle provisoire ; 2°) d'enjoindre au préfet du Finistère, sur le fondement

The criminal system knows only two conclusions in a criminal case—guilt or acquittal (see Articles 365, 366, 372 and 373 of the Code of Criminal Procedure).

Lagardère’s guilt.

The applicant admitted his guilt in the offence.

According to the court, the circumstantial evidence did not unambiguously point to the applicant’s guilt and there were other possible explanations for the events.

Yaremenko’s guilt in respect of that episode, since they were obtained in violation of the requirements of criminal procedure law.

The decision regarding the question of guilt is the jury's alone, while the court proceedings are determined by the High Court's three professional judges.

    The court noted that it had to base its conviction about a defendant’s guilt on certain and clear evidence when delivering a guilty verdict.

If the judge makes a simple finding of guilt, the guilty party shall be ordered to pay costs and, as appropriate, to perform restitution. A special confiscation order shall be made.” 45.

On 7 june 1984 the Regional Court (Arrondissementsrechtbank) of Amsterdam convicted the applicant and sentenced him in absentia to one year's imprisonment and a fine of one million Dutch guilders.

It found that despite its instructions given in the earlier remittal orders, the degree of the applicant’s guilt was not correctly established in the proceedings before the trial court.

Everyone shall be presumed innocent until his or her guilt has been established in accordance with the law.

    The criminal proceedings relating to the assessment of A.T.’s guilt involved several persons and there was a need to shed light and examine material concerning complex bribery schemes.

In particular, did the Supreme Court assess the applicants’ guilt, in whole or in part, by re-assessing the evidentiary value of testimony provided by the accused and witnesses before the District Court

final judgments of 3 June 2010 delivered by the Vâlcea County Court and 22 May 2014 delivered by the High Court of Cassation and Justice, the authorities reached contrasting conclusions concerning its guilt

also to examine   the case under Article 6, paragraph l (art. 6-1);         - held unanimously that the Netherlands were to pay to the applicant ll 897,40 Dutch guilders

Given the findings of guilt and consequent punishment, in particular, the disqualification, the Journalistic Council was called on to determine whether the applicant should be suspended from the Register

Since in those proceedings X was a private prosecutor, and not an accused, there was no formal examination nor ruling on his guilt.

In particular, did the courts rely, as proof of the applicants’ guilt, on incriminating evidence obtained through ill-treatment ( Jalloh v. Germany [GC], no. 54810/00, §   100, 11 July 2006)?