requérantes devant le tribunal administratif de Paris ; Sur le rejet des conclusions des recours gracieux tendant à ce qu'il ne soit plus délivré aux bateaux de permis de stationnement le long des berges

#Old agreements which have been notified.#Case 59-77.

Cela est d'ailleurs le cas pour le canton de Berne avec la loi sur la santé publique, dans ses articles 41 et suivants. 2.

The interference had therefore been prescribed by law.

    COMPLAINTS     The applicant complained that his medical treatment was inadequate; that as a result of the operation which had not been carried out correctly, he had been incessantly

On 2 February 2002, the applicant found out that Mr A.G. had been killed and that his wife had been taken seriously injured to hospital.

and that certain judges have been biased against her;     b)   under Article 8 of the Convention, that her right to respect for her family life and home has been violated.

COMPLAINTS The applicants complained that their son had been killed in a traffic accident, that the judgment of 27 April 2000 had not been enforced, that they had not been awarded benefits by their son

On 1 February 2006, after Mr Berge had been given an opportunity to comment in writing, the City Court upheld a request by the Attorney General (Civil Matters) to dismiss the case (Article 340 of the Cove

The applicant disputed that the case was very complex, finding instead that information on the facts and law would not have been difficult, in particular as a case with a similar subject matter had been

The president informed the applicant it had been established that the bill of indictment had been delivered to the detention centre, but that there was no evidence that it had indeed been served on the

However, no response has been received to date.

had been given four months after the judgment of the Supreme Administrative Court had been served on the Office.

She alleged in particular that the detention had been unlawful, and that the proceedings had been unfair. She alleged a violation of Articles 3, 5 and 14 of the Convention.

liquidation judiciaires des entreprises, ordonné la citation de la société AID'AU MAX, devant le tribunal siégeant en chambre du conseil à l'audience du 13/04/2026 ; Suivant acte du ministère de la SELARL BERNA

[Localité 4]) APPELANTS ET Monsieur [F] [N] né le 07 Novembre 1967 à [Localité 6] de nationalité Française [Adresse 2] [Localité 7] Représenté par Me Amélie DATHY de la SCP DUSSEAUX-BERNIER-VAN

C/ LE PREFET DE L'HERAULT COUR D'APPEL DE NÎMES Cabinet du Premier Président Ordonnance du 21 AVRIL 2026 (Au titre de l'article L. 742-4 du CESEDA) Nous, Mme Alexandra BERGER

déci TJ [Localité 1] 19 avril 2026 [M] C/ [Adresse 1] COUR D'APPEL DE NÎMES Cabinet du Premier Président Ordonnance du 21 AVRIL 2026 Nous, Mme Alexandra BERGER

la formule exécutoire délivrée le à Me FAGES Expédition délivrée à toutes les parties JUGEMENT Le Mardi 07 Avril 2026, le Tribunal judiciaire de TOULOUSE, Sous la présidence de Michel BERGE