of the Thessaloniki Administrative Court of Appeal rendered on 20 December 2001 which had referred the case back to the administration in order to revoke the urban expropriation of the said property because

The applicant tried to transfer to a different institution in Kherson but had to return to Armyansk because of the gap in curriculum and teaching methods.

B, représenté par Me Bechaux, demande au juge des référés : 1°) d'ordonner, sur le fondement de l'article L. 521-1 du code de justice administrative, la suspension de l'exécution de la décision implicite

Oleksiyivna LEV against Ukraine lodged on 8 June 2018 communicated on 31 July 2025 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The case concerns a situation where the proceedings in the applicant’s criminal case are stalled because

Vu la procédure suivante : Par une requête enregistrée le 26 janvier 2023, Mme A B, représentée par Me Bechaux, demande au juge des référés, sur le fondement de l'article L. 521-3 du code de justice

The Magistrates’ Court held that the applicant had been taken out of the bar because of her physical appearance and because she had disturbed the other customers but that it had not been proven that the

DEMANDEURS Madame [I] [D], demeurant [Adresse 3] représentée par Me Maud DAVAL-GUEDJ de la SCP COHEN GUEDJ - MONTERO - DAVAL GUEDJ, avocat au barreau d'AIX-EN-PROVENCE, Me Thierry BENSAUDE avocat au

#Vereniging tot Behoud van Natuurmonumenten in Nederland e.a. contre Commission européenne.

#Behoud van rechten van werknemers bij overgang van ondernemingen, vestigingen of onderdelen daarvan - Overgang van onderneming die in vrijwillige of gerechtelijke vereffening verkeert - Bevoegdheid van

They took mobile telephones to Bosnia and Herzegovina because they wanted to send signals to Bjelovar.

The hearing on 25 May 2017 was adjourned because of the absence of a judge owing to illness (according to the Government), and because the defence lawyer was also ill.

In particular, he submitted that the proceedings had been lengthy because the trial court had not severed his case from the cases of dozens of other co-defendants and because there had been long delays

They did not know the position of the second applicant’s ex-husband because Talibans did not have positions as in Sweden.

    On 7 October 2002 the hearing was adjourned because the judge was on a mission. On 1 December 2002 the case was transferred to another judge. 12.

The measure applied had not impaired the applicant’s right of access because the first instance judgment was not quashed by the appellate court due to the new legislation, but because the appellate court

The notification stated that the application had been rejected because the applicant had failed to demonstrate that he would face a risk in Tajikistan.

She submitted that the costs incurred by the intervener had been unnecessary because the intervention itself had not been necessary.

The head of the department who was responsible for overseeing the compliance with the procedure could not be disciplined because he had retired in 2006.

It also found that the fine was correctly determined because its size was in reference to an offence committed in respect of the tax period ending on 31 December 1997. B.