COMPLAINT The applicant complains under Article 6 of the Convention that the proceedings were unfair because the Transdniestrian courts were not “tribunals established by law”, the judges were not impartial

The applicant complains under Article 6 § 1 and under Article   1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention that the proceedings were unfair, because it had not been aware of the proceedings before the

Gilles BUFFET, Conseiller Greffier : Mme Claire BECCAVIN, lors des débats ARRET : -CONTRADICTOIRE - prononcé par mise à disposition de l'arrêt au greffe de la cour, les parties en ayant

chevaliers, le courlis corlieu, le pluvier argenté, le harelde de Miquelon, l'huitrier pie, les macreuses, l'oie rieuse, l'oie des moissons, la poule d'eau, le râle d'eau, le canard siffleur, les bécassines

David Richier, Mme Béatrix Peret, M. Stéphane Catoire, Délibéré par les mêmes juges et prononcé à l'audience publique où siégeaient M.

In those proceedings they were appointed and represented by a guardian ad litem because their address was allegedly unknown.

He also complains under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention that the proceedings were not fair because, inter alia , the courts did not give sufficient reasons in their judgments, the principle of equality

The applicant alleged under Article 6 of the Convention that the proceedings against him were unfair and violated his right to equality of arms because the last-instance court overturned his acquittal

The applicant states that he has not been given access to adequate dental treatment and assistance because there is no dentist and dental equipment in the prison.

Board ( Commissie van Toezicht ) of the Rotterdam prison, location “De Schie”, dismissed the applicant’s complaint that the strip search had violated his rights under Articles 3 and 8 of the Convention because

The prosecutor dismissed his request replying that the (one month) time-limit expired because the judgment was registered later than two months after its delivery.

The applicant claimed that she could not leave for Eritrea, because she did not want to complete the mandatory national service, in which women are subjected to inhuman treatment, and because as a single

Gilles REVELLES, Conseiller Mme Natacha PINOY, Conseillère Greffier : Mme Claire BECCAVIN, lors des débats ARRET : - CONTRADICTOIRE - prononcé par mise à disposition de l'arrêt au greffe

Retenu, délibéré et prononcé à l'audience où siégeaient : Mme Béatrix Peret, juge présidant l'audience, Mme Nathalie Buquen, juge, et M.

Maintient Mme Béatrix Peret, juge-commissaire.

délibéré de la cour, composée de : Madame Marie-Odile DEVILLERS, Présidente de chambre Madame Sophie BRINET, Présidente de chambre Monsieur Gilles BUFFET, Conseiller Greffier : Madame Claire BECCAVIN

délibéré de la cour, composée de : Madame Sophie BRINET, Présidente de chambre Madame Marie-Odile DEVILLERS, Présidente de chambre Monsieur Gilles BUFFET, Conseiller Greffier : Madame Claire BECCAVIN

plaidoiries dans le délibéré de la cour, composée de : Madame Sophie BRINET, Présidente de chambre Monsieur Gilles BUFFET, Conseiller Monsieur Christophe LATIL, Conseiller Greffier : Madame Claire BECCAVIN