At 8.20 p.m. he was questioned by an investigator as a witness and at 12.35 a.m. an arrest record was drawn up.

The applicants complained under Article 3, Article 5 §§ 1, 2, 4 and 5 and Article 13 of the Convention about the alleged poor conditions of detention at the Kumkapı Foreigners’ Removal Centre, the alleged

The applicants, who had been present at the trial at first instance and had been represented by lawyers of their choosing, had decided not to attend the hearings in the Court of Appeal despite having been

concerning the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 6 July 2004 (final on 6 October 2004) in the case of Dondarini against San Marino   (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 18 July 2005 at

At the first interview, the applicant answered all questions. At the second, he stated at one point that he would have been happier if he had been accompanied by a solicitor.

home fermetures, société At home fermetures, la société Mutuelle des architectes français en qualité d’assureur de M.

On 3 January 2003 the Saray public prosecutor conducted an on-site examination at which the other six persons, who had been with the victim at the time of the shooting, were heard as witnesses.

At the same time, the applicant argued that he was not able to appear at the hearing owing to his state of health. 49.

protest   St Petersburg   27/02/2022 article 20.2.2 §   1 of CAO detention for 13 days St Petersburg City Court 10/03/2022 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at

Vu : - la loi organique n° 2004-192 du 27 février 2004 ; - la délibération modifiée n° 95-215 AT du 14 décembre 1995 ; - la délibération n° 95-216 AT du 14 décembre 1995 ; - le code de justice administrative

On 3 April 2008 the applicant shot at a lawyer on the premises of the Dzerzhynskyy District Court. The lawyer was seriously injured. The applicant was arrested at the scene of the crime.

At the time of her admission, she was handed a booklet advising patients about their possible involvement in the hospital’s clinical teaching programme.

:super } Interim Resolution CM/ResDH(2018)469 Execution of the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights Paksas against Lithuania   (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 6 December 2018 at

de cette affection, dont les incidences financières ont été imputées sur le compte employeur 2018 de la société [5], impactant ses taux de cotisation accidents du travail et maladies professionnelles (AT

is taken, but also that obtaining at the time the national court decides on the merits of the case; the gravity of the charge, the severity of the statutory penalty at stake, the complexity of the case

It gave the following reasons for its decision (at paragraphs 34–40 of the judgment: “...The question is whether the conviction of the applicant at the third trial is unsafe.

One of the police officers, Mr K.A., was also examined by a doctor at the Menemen State Hospital at the same time.

  Pascal Taïs was first taken to hospital at about 11 p.m.

In the context of the examination of their appeal on points of law, the reporting judge’s report and the advocate-general’s submissions were presented for the first time orally at the public hearing.