He claimed that the meeting had been organised by an illegal composition of the board because its president, S.S., had not been a board member but had voted at the meeting.

considered their income lawful within the meaning of the CPA. 10.

A meeting was held between the Gaming Board and the non-executive directors of LCL and their legal advisors on 26 March 1992.

She claimed that she had attended the meeting, organised by a group called “the Peace Mothers' Initiative”, as the President of the Istanbul Human Rights Association, and that she had been arrested by

    In May 1998 the Ministry of Privatisation and of State Property published its decision to sell shares in a State-owned transport company in Bălţi.

    The applicant and Mr L. co-owned a small estate which comprised a plot of land, a house, a shed, a well and a fence (“the estate”).

The events complained of, which concern the expropriation of those shares and subordinated bonds, are set out in Stefania Adorisio and Others against the Netherlands and three other applications (dec),

On 2 September 2003 O.M. complained to the Ciocana police section of Chişinău about the applicant’s swearing at her during the meeting of their housing association on 29 August 2003.

    On 15 June 2020 the representatives of Geothermal Solutions convened a general meeting of Geoen.

  plots nos. 511 and 513, sheet/plan 11/14E.2, plots of land, area: 3,862 sq. m and 3,405 sq. m respectively; (c)     plots nos. 19, 20, 28 and 29, sheet/plan 11/15W.1, plots of land, area

in a bank (“Yaşarbank”), could not be considered lawful within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol No.

The head teachers were also requested to prevent those who supported such misconduct for political and ideological ends from meeting within the vicinity of the school.

    Until 1998 the State owned all shares in the first applicant.

She turned up alone and refused to divulge the whereabouts of the child. However, she confirmed that her son was in good health physically and was happy to remain with her.

Firstly, she challenged the lifting of the charging order. Secondly, she challenged the delay in enforcement.

However, the Poznań Court of Appeal considered this judgment to be an isolated example and did not share the approach adopted therein. B.     Relevant domestic law and practice 1.

Furthermore, in the preface, introduction and conclusion of the book the author had emphasised in clear terms that his intention had been to shed light on the unknown world of the Roma community, which

    At around midnight on 4 April 2016 some shells hit the area surrounding the applicant’s house, situated 400-500 metres away from the line of contact.

On 9 December 1994 the applicant company made an offer to the Government to return the Plant into state ownership in exchange for a certain number of the applicant company’s shares.