The Court has also accepted that a person’s reputation (see Pfeifer v. Austria , no. 12556/03, § 35, 15 November 2007) and honour (see Sanchez Cardenas v.

Sweden judgment of 21   February 1990, Series   A No. 171, § 66 and Pfeifer , Plankl v.

  64915/01, §   70, ECHR 2004 ‑ VI, and Pfeifer v. Austria , no. 12556/03, §   35, 15   November 2007).

Court HR, Pfeifer and Plankl v. Austria judgment of 25 February 1992, Series A no. 227, pp. 16-17, para. 37).   The Commission has added in Poitrimol v. France (Eur.

Pfieffer,   Advisers ; (b)   for the applicants Mr   D . Pannick QC , Mr   J. Bowers QC,   Counsel , Mr   S . Grosz, Ms   H .

  64915/01, §   70, ECHR 2004-VI; Pfeifer v. Austria , no. 12556/03, § 35, 15   November 2007; Polanco Torres and Movilla Polanco v. Spain , no.

obliged, by their positive obligations under Article 8 of the Convention to regulate the exercise of freedom of expression so as to ensure adequate protection by law of individuals’ reputations (see Pfeifer

reputation, even if that person is criticised in the context of a public debate, forms part of his personal identity and psychological integrity and thus falls within the scope of private life (see Pfeifer

s211D6B00 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; line-height:normal; widows:0; orphans:0; font-size:8.5pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial }  Application No. 12811/87   Manfred RADERMACHER and Klaus PFERRER

Convention to be given effect – if at all – it must be established in an unequivocal manner, a waiver of procedural rights requiring in addition minimum guarantees commensurate to its importance (see Pfeifer

Pfyffer et al., Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis in Prison Inmates, Azerbaijan , Emerging Infectious Diseases, Vol. 7, No. 5, September-October 2005: “According to the International Committee of the Red

The Court has held that a person’s right to protection of his or her reputation is encompassed by Article 8 as part of the right to respect for private life (see, recently, Pfeifer v.

Specifically, in respect to the protection of an individual’s reputation, the Court notes that it has been acknowledged as an interest guaranteed by Article 8 of the Convention (see, inter alia , Pfeifer

:11pt } .s211D6B00 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; line-height:normal; widows:0; orphans:0; font-size:8.5pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial }    Application No. 10802/84   Heinrich PFEIFER

This was confirmed in Pfeifer v.

Specifically, in respect to the protection of an individual’s reputation, the Court notes that it has been acknowledged as an interest guaranteed by Article 8 of the Convention (see, inter alia , Pfeifer

was criticised in the context of a public debate, formed part of his or her personal identity and psychological integrity and therefore also fell within the scope of his or her “private life” (see Pfeifer

Court has also concluded that a person’s reputation is part of their personal identity and moral integrity, which are a matter of private life even if the person is criticised in a public debate (see Pfeifer

Norway , no. 12148/03, §§ 37-39, 4 October 2007; Pfeifer v.   Austria , no. 12556/03, §§ 47-48, 15 November 2007; and A.   v.   Norway , cited above, §   73).