Phillips, Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 28 March 2010, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The applicant, Ms Astrid Krämer, is a German

Dougin, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 24 May 2012, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The applicant, Mr Istvan Repaczki, is a German

Marialena Tsirli, Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 14 November 2005, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS The applicant, Mr Markus Laubert, is a German

} .sBB8EAEF9 { width:14.64pt; display:inline-block } .sD7E732C3 { width:153.64pt; display:inline-block }     FIFTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 57863/15 Uwe Reinhold ODERMATT against Germany

The applicant association requested the Minister of Justice to hold a press conference and to give a public clarification that such opinions did not have a place in present day Germany.

Germany , no. 29357/95, § 70, ECHR 2000 ‑ II and Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000 ‑ VII).

  Germany and various follow-up cases, the German Federal Constitutional Court held in a judgment of 4   May 2011 that provisions on the retrospective prolongation of preventive detention beyond

It underlined that there was under German law no legal basis to grant the applicant sole custody rights if the child’s mother did not agree. 6.

Germany (dec.), no. 61603/00, 26 October 2004). 38.

    The applicants are German citizens. They live respectively in Oberhausen and Mülheim/Ruhr.

    The applicant was born in 1980 and lives in Krefeld (Germany). 8.     On 25 August 2001 she gave birth to a child in Germany whose father, A., is a Portuguese national. 9.

Claudia Westerdiek, Section Registrar , Having regard to the above application lodged on 18 July 2006, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS The applicant, Ms Martina Drößer-Brand, is a German

On 24   March 2004 the Court received the Government’s observations in German on the admissibility and merits of the application.

Germany (No. 53126/07) and G. v.

  He complains of the Federal Government's consent to the deployment of Pershing II missiles in the Federal Republic of Germany.

GERMANY   The European Court of Human Rights is holding a Grand Chamber [1] hearing today Wednesday 24 September 2008 at 9 a.m. , in the case of Mooren v. Germany (application no. 11364/03).

The German Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mrs A. Wittling-Vogel, Ministerialdirigentin , of the German Ministry of Justice.

) in German court proceedings.

    The applicant, born in 1926, is a German national and residing in Bad Neuenahr. 10.