CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-6982
30 mai 2000
Iceland - 32451/96 Judgment 30.5.2000 [Section I] Article 6 Article 6-2 Presumption of innocence Test of probability of guilt applied in determining entitlement to compensation following acquittal: friendly
Page 37 sur 2531
ECLI:CEDH:002-6530
24 août 1999
.) - 32451/96 Decision 24.8.1999 [Section I] Article 6 Article 6-2 Presumption of innocence Test of probability of guilt applied in determining entitlement to compensation following acquittal: admissible
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-209012
2 mars 2021
The relevant arrest report indicated that the applicant had been arrested whilst committing a crime or attempting to commit one, or immediately after a crime has been committed, following the statements
ECLI:CEDH:002-13782
17 mars 2022
It was however, retained by the authorities for almost a year and a half following their acquittal.
ECLI:CEDH:001-181773
22 février 2018
Following an appeal by the applicant, on 11 October 2011 the Lviv Administrative Court of Appeal upheld the above-mentioned decision.
ECLI:CEDH:002-6578
14 septembre 1999
The Commission concluded, in its report of 11 January 1994, that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1, following which the Committee of Ministers passed a Resolution on 15 November 1996.
CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:1204REP002920295
4 décembre 1998
Following a hearing in camera on 2 December 1994, the Regional Court dismissed the objection. 24.
ECLI:CEDH:002-10544
12 mai 2015
Following the events, the applicants filed several criminal complaints, requesting in particular that criminal investigations be launched into the attacks against them by the counter-demonstrators which
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-572815-575444
20 juin 2002
Section 3 Violation Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 In the following nine Turkish cases, the applicants complained about delays in the payment of compensation due to them following the
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0615DEC004337004
15 juin 2010
However, he was subsequently released following the intercession of the Government of the Russian Federation. 12.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0710JUD007934016
10 juillet 2025
Article 79 § 1 stipulates that, before assuming office, MPs shall take the following oath: “I swear allegiance to Ukraine.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0917DEC003235709
17 septembre 2013
The Government submitted that the applicant’s complaint was based on a misconception, namely that he was and continued to be detained by reference to the occurrence of the events forming
ECLI:CEDH:002-3843
12 mai 2005
Turkey [GC] - 46221/99 Judgment 12.5.2005 [GC] Article 3 Inhuman punishment Imposition of death sentence following proceedings found to be unfair: violation Conditions of transfer following arrest outside
ECLI:CEDH:001-117437
19 février 2013
Following a cassation appeal by the mayor, in a decision of 25 May 2004 the Supreme Administrative Court upheld the lower court’s decision.
ECLI:CEDH:001-111103
13 avril 2012
She added the following comment: “It does not behove me to judge the actions of the Office of the Prosecutor General.
PRESS;FORTHCOMINGJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2123946-2267185
28 septembre 2007
Repetitive cases The following cases raise issues which have already been submitted to the Court. Bolluk v.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0310DEC002140693
10 mars 1994
Following her release she pursued her dissident activities underground.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0513DEC005929000
13 mai 2003
Six points shall be deducted for relatively serious offences [délits] under the following Articles: ... 2.
ECLI:CEDH:003-799923-817397
29 juillet 2003
The case has been struck out following a friendly settlement in which 12,000 zlotys is to be paid for any pecuniary or non-pecuniary damage and for costs and expenses.
ECLI:CEDH:003-3051269-3388605
12 mars 2010
Repetitive cases The following cases raise issues which have already been submitted to the Court. Companhia Agrícola das Polvorosas S.A. v.