CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

50 615 résultats pour « Folzing »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-6982

Admin. suprême

30 mai 2000

30 mai 2000

Iceland - 32451/96 Judgment 30.5.2000 [Section I] Article 6 Article 6-2 Presumption of innocence Test of probability of guilt applied in determining entitlement to compensation following acquittal: friendly

Source officielle

Page 37 sur 2531

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-6530

Admin. suprême

24 août 1999

24 août 1999

.) - 32451/96 Decision 24.8.1999 [Section I] Article 6 Article 6-2 Presumption of innocence Test of probability of guilt applied in determining entitlement to compensation following acquittal: admissible

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-209012

Admin. suprême

2 mars 2021

2 mars 2021

The relevant arrest report indicated that the applicant had been arrested whilst committing a crime or attempting to commit one, or immediately after a crime has been committed, following the statements

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-13782

Admin. suprême

17 mars 2022

17 mars 2022

It was however, retained by the authorities for almost a year and a half following their acquittal.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-181773

Admin. suprême

22 février 2018

22 février 2018

Following an appeal by the applicant, on 11 October 2011 the Lviv Administrative Court of Appeal upheld the above-mentioned decision.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-6578

Admin. suprême

14 septembre 1999

14 septembre 1999

The Commission concluded, in its report of 11 January 1994, that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1, following which the Committee of Ministers passed a Resolution on 15 November 1996.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:1204REP002920295

Admin. suprême

4 décembre 1998

4 décembre 1998

  Following a hearing in camera on 2 December 1994, the Regional Court dismissed the objection.   24.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-10544

Admin. suprême

12 mai 2015

12 mai 2015

Following the events, the applicants filed several criminal complaints, requesting in particular that criminal investigations be launched into the attacks against them by the counter-demonstrators which

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-572815-575444

Admin. suprême

20 juin 2002

20 juin 2002

  Section 3     Violation Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 In the following nine Turkish cases, the applicants complained about delays in the payment of compensation due to them following the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0615DEC004337004

Admin. suprême

15 juin 2010

15 juin 2010

However, he was subsequently released following the intercession of the Government of the Russian Federation. 12.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0710JUD007934016

Admin. suprême

10 juillet 2025

10 juillet 2025

    Article 79 § 1 stipulates that, before assuming office, MPs shall take the following oath: “I swear allegiance to Ukraine.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0917DEC003235709

Admin. suprême

17 septembre 2013

17 septembre 2013

    The Government submitted that the applicant’s complaint was based on a misconception, namely that he was and continued to be detained by reference to the occurrence of the events forming

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-3843

Admin. suprême

12 mai 2005

12 mai 2005

Turkey [GC] - 46221/99 Judgment 12.5.2005 [GC] Article 3 Inhuman punishment Imposition of death sentence following proceedings found to be unfair: violation Conditions of transfer following arrest outside

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-117437

Admin. suprême

19 février 2013

19 février 2013

Following a cassation appeal by the mayor, in a decision of 25 May 2004 the Supreme Administrative Court upheld the lower court’s decision.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-111103

Admin. suprême

13 avril 2012

13 avril 2012

She added the following comment: “It does not behove me to judge the actions of the Office of the Prosecutor General.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;FORTHCOMINGJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2123946-2267185

Admin. suprême

28 septembre 2007

28 septembre 2007

    Repetitive cases   The following cases raise issues which have already been submitted to the Court.   Bolluk v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0310DEC002140693

Admin. suprême

10 mars 1994

10 mars 1994

Following her release she pursued her dissident activities underground.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0513DEC005929000

Admin. suprême

13 mai 2003

13 mai 2003

    Six points shall be deducted for relatively serious offences [délits] under the following Articles: ... 2.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-799923-817397

Admin. suprême

29 juillet 2003

29 juillet 2003

  The case has been struck out following a friendly settlement in which 12,000 zlotys is to be paid for any pecuniary or non-pecuniary damage and for costs and expenses.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;FORTHCOMINGJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-3051269-3388605

Admin. suprême

12 mars 2010

12 mars 2010

    Repetitive cases   The following cases raise issues which have already been submitted to the Court.   Companhia Agrícola das Polvorosas S.A. v.

Source officielle